Jacques Kallis vs Dale Steyn

[kyear2]

Sure

If it doesn't, feel free to say, but to me it does.

May not be your perspective, but it's not without merit either.

 

[capt_Luffy]

And I think that's it's idiotic to think that the gap between Bradman and the next set of guys, ie Tendulkar, Sobers, Richards and Hobbs is equal to that of Hutton and Stokes is idiotic.

But apparently you believe that Bradman would have averaged 100 in the 80's or 90's.

Would had averaged well over 75, if me being too hard on him. That's the 66% more than the best guys in Richards, Gavaskar and Tendulkar, and what Sobers would had. So yeah, Hutton and Stokes.

 

[subshakerz]

If it doesn't, feel free to say, but to me it does.

May not be your perspective, but it's not without merit either.

No it's fine you clarified your point and I don't have any major disagreement.

 

[kyear2]

Would had averaged well over 75, if me being too hard on him. That's the 66% more than the best guys in Richards, Gavaskar and Tendulkar, and what Sobers would had. So yeah, Hutton and Stokes.

None of the bowlers he faced during his test career would even suggest this.

But carry on.

 

[kyear2]

No it's fine you clarified your point and I don't have any major disagreement.

Forgive me, you've never not had a comeback before.

 

[capt_Luffy]

None of the bowlers he faced during his test career would even suggest this.

But carry on.

Lol. But his numbers will. And that would just suggest none of Hammond or Headley were ATVGs, let alone ATGs, but carry on, you have literally nothing to suggest anything lower.