England XI vs South Africa XI (since 1990)

[PlayerComparisons]

Or just stop with the arbitrary cutoffs, it's disingenuous.

What’s wrong with comparing two teams within a certain timeframe?

 

[Coronis]

What’s wrong with comparing two teams within a certain timeframe?

Nothing if they’re actually comparable.

 

[sayon basak]

What’s wrong with comparing two teams within a certain timeframe?

It hurts their team's strength I guess.

 

[kyear2]

What’s wrong with comparing two teams within a certain timeframe?

Nothing if it's not coming with an agenda.

 

[Johan]

What’s wrong with comparing two teams within a certain timeframe?

do England vs India and cut it off at 1979

 

[PlayerComparisons]

do England vs India and cut it off at 1979

I’m just interested in comparing them in the modern era though

You can make that one if it interests you lol

 

[Johan]

I’m just interested in comparing them in the modern era though

You can make that one if it interests you lol

As I thought

 

[PlayerComparisons]

As I thought
View attachment 42083

I mean I thought it was obvious I was comparing these countries in the modern era (which I associate with post 1970) lol. Not sure what you’re tryna say.

 

[Johan]

I mean I thought it was obvious I was comparing these countries in the modern era (which I associate with post 1970) lol. Not sure what you’re tryna say.

It's obvious what I'm saying.

 

[PlayerComparisons]

It's obvious what I'm saying.

Ok

 

[subshakerz]

Nothing if it's not coming with an agenda.

Dude stop whining about agendas and pretending to be the disinterested observer. We all have them and we roll with it.

 

[Johan]

Ok

k

 

[sayon basak]

k

 

[OverratedSanity]

The day you start posting actual opinions instead of whatever slimy, disingenuous **** all this is, feel free to tag me for chat. In the mean time, piss off.

Oh and also delete your account

Lmao I don't know this seems like somewhat of an overreaction.

 

[sayon basak]

Lmao I don't know this seems like somewhat of an overreaction.

He was not having a good day ig.

 

[Coronis]

Lmao I don't know this seems like somewhat of an overreaction.

Best post of the thread tho

 

[PlayerComparisons]

He was not having a good day ig.

Yea I’m sure he loves these threads on his good days

 

[peterhrt]

England v South Africa Test averages since readmission in 1992.

Batting averages: Qualification 800 runs

England: Trescothick 51, Root 46, Bairstow 45, Pietersen 45, Stokes 45, Hussain 43, Atherton 43, Stewart 39, Butcher 38, Strauss 38, Thorpe 35, Cook 35, Flintoff 32, Vaughan 26.

South Africa: Smith 56, Amla 52, Cullinan 49, G Kirsten 48, Kallis 44, Gibbs 43, de Villiers 42, Rhodes 40, Boucher 34, Elgar 34.

Bowling averages: 30 wickets

England: Moeen Ali 35@25, Stokes 39@26, Fraser 35@26, Broad 89@27, Cork 37@28, Anderson 103@30, Flintoff 48@37, Gough 43@38.

South Africa: Donald 86@23, Pollock 91@23, Philander 30@24, Rabada 66@25, Morkel 79@28, Steyn 50@31, Adams 32@32, Ntini 70@34, Maharaj 31@35, Kallis 50@35.

 

[Coronis]

England v South Africa Test averages since readmission in 1992.

Batting averages: Qualification 800 runs

England: Trescothick 51, Root 46, Bairstow 45, Pietersen 45, Stokes 45, Hussain 43, Atherton 43, Stewart 39, Butcher 38, Strauss 38, Thorpe 35, Cook 35, Flintoff 32, Vaughan 26.

South Africa: Smith 56, Amla 52, Cullinan 49, G Kirsten 48, Kallis 44, Gibbs 43, de Villiers 42, Rhodes 40, Boucher 34, Elgar 34.

Bowling averages: 30 wickets

England: Moeen Ali 35@25, Stokes 39@26, Fraser 35@26, Broad 89@27, Cork 37@28, Anderson 103@30, Flintoff 48@37, Gough 43@38.

South Africa: Donald 86@23, Pollock 91@23, Philander 30@24, Rabada 66@25, Morkel 79@28, Steyn 50@31, Adams 32@32, Ntini 70@34, Maharaj 31@35, Kallis 50@35.

rip Steyn and Kallis. Not so great anymore

 

[sayon basak]

Yea I’m sure he loves these threads on his good days