PlayerComparisons
International Vice-Captain
As long as no bad injuries, he should end up with more runs and a higher average than Crowe tbhBig claims alert
As long as no bad injuries, he should end up with more runs and a higher average than Crowe tbhBig claims alert
Still would take quite some brilliant effort to top Williamson's average.As long as no bad injuries, he should end up with more runs and a higher average than Crowe tbh
He should end up with a much more well rounded record but will probably average lower overallStill would take quite some brilliant effort to top Williamson's average.
Crowe>Ravindra needs to clarification. My guy is only into his 10th test.Crowe > either tbh
Yea obviously crowe is better rn lol. Rachin is crazy talented tho and could potentially end with a better record.Crowe>Ravindra needs to clarification. My guy is only into his 10th test.
Not sure about the other tho. Think choosing someone averaging 10 more wouldn't be irrational.
Crowe vs Williamson is like Gooch vs Amla, obviously I've Crowe > Gooch and Williamson > Amla but you get the idea.Crowe>Ravindra needs to clarification. My guy is only into his 10th test.
Not sure about the other tho. Think choosing someone averaging 10 more wouldn't be irrational.
Now now, don't get ahead of ourselves. Williamson is absolutely the best batsman at home, in pretty tough home conditions. Definitely in the tier of Root and Kohli.
I don't agree either.Now now, don't get ahead of ourselves. Williamson is absolutely the best batsman at home, in pretty tough home conditions. Definitely in the tier of Woakes and Jadeja
With the sentence in quotes I don't agree with as wellI don't agree either.
Not rating Amla is weird.Crowe vs Williamson is like Gooch vs Amla, obviously I've Crowe > Gooch and Williamson > Amla but you get the idea.
Cook tier to meNot rating Amla is weird.
Top 3 in NZEasier than Australia, England, India and South Africa according to the data above
I said batting top 3 in NZ is easier than those 4 countries, not sure why you're showing me 4-7. Obviously it's easier batting down the order. That applies anywhere in the world not just NZ.Top 3 in NZ
Batting records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com
stats.espncricinfo.com
Because the stats you referred to weren't at all about the top 3 and the ones I showed were. Batting in the top 3 is harder in NZ. Meanwhile you're acting like the bowling figures that show the numbers are all within 1-2 are definitive for your point.I said batting top 3 in NZ is easier than those 4 countries, not sure why you're showing me 4-7. Obviously it's easier batting down the order. That applies anywhere in the world not just NZ.
I checked anyways and batting averages for the top 3 in NZ, Aus, Ind, SA and Eng in that same time period are all thereabouts in the 25-30 range with SA and Eng at either end so what I said was wrong if you take the numbers at face value.
KW should definitely get extra credit for batting in the top 3. I just don't think you need to bring up NZ specifically as if it's harder to bat there than anywhere else.