• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Gooch vs Gilchrist as test batsman?

Better test batsman


  • Total voters
    19

Johan

State Vice-Captain
Gilchrist adds more to the side than Gooch does even with batting, so Adam Gilchrist

However, I'll say they're close as Batsmen, Gilly only played 9 years, Gooch from 82-93 was averaging 49 with the bat too and played in a much tougher era, so at batsmenship they're compareable.
 
Last edited:

Majestic

U19 Captain
Hard to compare because the roles are different.

But if you have to pick one in team, it will be Gilchrist because no keeper batter is anywhere close to him in tests.
 

HouHsiaoHsien

International Debutant
Gooch better bat easily. Gooch as an opener had some amazing series and averaged close to 50 for 10+ years. I don’t see Gilly as opener doing well against peak Waqar and Wasim, much less the WI pacers
 

ma1978

International Debutant
What’s with the Gooch love. Total hack who got lucky late career but was a mid 30s player for a long time. And a racist to boot. Shouldn’t have come anywhere near the English captaincy.
 

sayon basak

International Debutant
What’s with the Gooch love. Total hack who got lucky late career but was a mid 30s player for a long time. And a racist to boot. Shouldn’t have come anywhere near the English captaincy.
What does that have to do with anything?
 

ma1978

International Debutant
It’s also not close between Gilchrist and Gooch.: Gilly was a superstar of a bat, a true game changer, the guy you feared the most in someways in an aATG lineup
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
Don't be politically pedantic now. When people compare present day morals with the past, they often forgets how the morality changes over time. What's considered normal back then may raise eyebrows now, as will what's considered normal now will in the future. Ofcourse there are still things which were simply evil and should be criticized even considering the era (slavery, sati, human sacrifice, etc), but touring SA to play cricket, I hardly believe qualifies as something outright repugnant. Sure, not a great thing to do but not repugnant. If India plays a Test match with Afghanistan now, does it makes Ashwin mysogynists? If India plays a football match with Israel, does Indians supports genocide?
 

ma1978

International Debutant
Don't be politically pedantic now. When people compare present day morals with the past, they often forgets how the morality changes over time. What's considered normal back then may raise eyebrows now, as will what's considered normal now will in the future. Ofcourse there are still things which were simply evil and should be criticized even considering the era (slavery, sati, human sacrifice, etc), but touring SA to play cricket, I hardly believe qualifies as something outright repugnant. Sure, not a great thing to do but not repugnant. If India plays a Test match with Afghanistan now, does it makes Ashwin mysogynists? If India plays a football match with Israel, does Indians supports genocide?
South Africa was banned from international sporting ties. It was repugnant. People viewed it as such then. The West Indies players who went were ostaracized.
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
South Africa was banned from international sporting ties. It was repugnant. People viewed it as such then. The West Indies players who went were ostaracized.
I think WI players being ostracized was more personal, due to their race. Also, back then it was a topic of hot debate, with plenty people believing SA to return to Test cricket at any time.

Edit: To clarify, I am not saying whether Apartheid was justified was debated back then. It was universally repugnant. The debate was mixing sports with politics.
 
Last edited:

ma1978

International Debutant
I think WI players being ostracized was more personal, due to their race. Also, back then it was a topic of hot debate, with plenty people believing SA to return to Test cricket at any time.

Edit: To clarify, I am not saying whether Apartheid was justified was debated back then. It was universally repugnant. The debate was mixing sports with politics.
it’s a fair point. As players though having seen prime Gooch and Gilchrist’s entire career, I don’t think there’s a lot to debate here.
 

Top