• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Australia limited overs tour of Scotland and England 2024

TheJediBrah

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Molehill said:
Salt would’ve been out first ball again but for a no ball. His captaincy in the field was kind of odd and the decision to bowl completely wrong.

But he’s been dealt a bad hand with this squad.
Click to expand...
3) inexperienced captain. Managed to weave excuses 1) & 2) in the same comment as well, most impressive
 
GoodAreasShane

GoodAreasShane

Cricketer Of The Year
I would father see the random score updates than any of this "wahhhhhhhhhhhhhh england hard done by" drivel all day everyday.

And it isn't even close
 
Nintendo

Nintendo

Cricketer Of The Year
Did they drop Tim David in a pool or something? Past 3 games he's been a completely different level of fielder.
 
Daemon

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I set it up for “his innings was regulation for him too” but that’s decent
 
Nintendo

Nintendo

Cricketer Of The Year
Watching the highlights, and the last two balls stoinis face are so classic. 4 off 6 vs spin, hits some straight as an arrow for 6, then next ball he decides to reverse sweep and gets out. He's never been good at that shot, no idea why he keeps on playing it.
 
Nintendo

Nintendo

Cricketer Of The Year
Also, next game ide adjust the batting order slightly. Bat David at 7 and move green and inglis around that 4 and 6 position.
 
Q

Qlder

International Debutant
Is Meredith fit to play? With Bartlett injured there are no other bowlers in the squad.

Likely we see Hardie back next game. That means Green, Hardie or David will bat #8 for a very deep batting line-up with Abbott at #9. Given both teams were just bowled out in 19th over probably not a bad thing
 
wpdavid

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Molehill said:
Given the squad available, hard to see how this doesn’t finish 3-0. Mousley can replace a seamer, but there’s simply not enough batting. The squad is daft, can’t they draft Brook or Duckett in?
Click to expand...
It's probably fair enough to guys who have just played six tests and will be flying out to Pakistan in half an hour or so. And I'm not going to write off Cox and Bethell after one appearance. Obviously the Overton selection is daft though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top