Muttiah Muralitharan vs Viv Richards

[Xix2565]

If you have a top 12 list and 10 are bowlers, the list is objectively flawed.

And this has morning to do with Viv or any other player.

It is in no way flawed beyond your feelings. You just have no real point to make, as has almost always been the case.

Its like a 60/40 thing you are making 80/20.

It is an 80/20 case here precisely because of where Murali and Viv sit among their bowling and batting peers. 60/40 would be something like Viv vs Wasim.

 

[subshakerz]

It is an 80/20 case here precisely because of where Murali and Viv sit among their bowling and batting peers. 60/40 would be something like Viv vs Wasim.

Murali isnt rated as high actually.

 

[Xix2565]

Murali isnt rated as high actually.

That's a problem with you, not with the player. Still haven't seen anything worth considering.

 

[subshakerz]

That's a problem with you, not with the player. Still haven't seen anything worth considering.

You haven't supported your own statement of where they sit.

 

[Xix2565]

You haven't supported your own statement of where they sit.

I have, you just ignored it like always. You see validity and think it's nonsense.

 

[Xix2565]

The fact that no one has managed a reasonable argument for Viv without ignoring how Tests work is just proof of Murali's greatness.

 

[kyear2]

I have, you just ignored it like always. You see validity and think it's nonsense.

Likely because it's nonsense.

 

[Xix2565]

Likely because it's nonsense.

It's rarely challenged by the likes of you. Clearly because it's far more grounded than anything you post.

 

[CartyDurham]

Richards