• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Richard Hadlee vs Imran Khan

Who is the better test bowler?


  • Total voters
    29

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Have u ever seen me calculate in Viv's average from WSC to make a point? I've said he was one of only 3 batsmen to do well, and it adds to his legacy, and shows what he was doing for two years in the peak of his prime.

I also use it for Barry to prove his quality absent a full test portfolio.

That's different to simply saying that in Imran's test career, him averaging 28 in Australia was below par. No one is saying he couldn't bowl well in Australia or didn't have good performances there.
Literally how is it different mate? Imran's stats in Australia would look quite a bit better if you included wsc numbers and would add to his legacy just like Viv's did. I don't even know what you mean here. Why is it ok to consider those games as a positive when talking about Viv but when it comes to Imran it's ignored.

You hold up WSC as the highest level of cricket too unlike me, so to completely ignore the fact that Imran was extremely successful in the few games he played there seems unfair.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Literally how is it different mate? Imran's stats in Australia would look quite a bit better if you included wsc numbers and would add to his legacy just like Viv's did. I don't even know what you mean here. Why is it ok to consider those games as a positive when talking about Viv but when it comes to Imran it's ignored.

You hold up WSC as the highest level of cricket too unlike me, so to completely ignore the fact that Imran was extremely successful in the few games he played there seems unfair.
It's a total copout. He literally has never brought up WSC in respect to Imran until we all did, unlike Viv. He is just pissed he can't go with his preconceived notions.
 

shortpitched713

International Captain
And why is it so important to change my mind?
No, I don't care to change your mind. I just am pointing out how laughable, and divorced from reality of watching cricket, this particular take is. There's only a handful of bowlers who could perform away in West Indies at a high level during their heyday, which ankitj showed evidence of.

We're talking about one of the absolute most successful bowlers against the high level West Indies side over any sustained period playing there, and who didn't just perform well statistically, but also won matches.

In the face of that, and knowing you're a West Indies fan (presumably from there too, I'm guessing?), it's now becoming more clear that there's a certain amount of salt that's emanating from your takes.

It's okay dude, it's been almost 40 years since Imran blasted through your heroes.
 

kyear2

International Coach
Stats of fast bowlers on the two Imran tours to WI:

1977:

Imran : 25 wickets @31
Croft: 33 wickets @20
Garner: 25 wickets @28
Andy Roberts: 19 wickets @40

1988:

Imran: 23 wickets @18
Marshall: 15 wickets @19
Benjamin: 12 wickets @24
Wasim: 11 wickets @29
Ambrose : 7 wickets @52

That's pretty damn great isn't it? Could argue that among all the WI bowlers on those tours only croft came away with clearly better numbers (Garner kinda arguable but about the same tbh considering Imran's bowling to a far better batting lineup) . And Imran was comfortably the best statistical performer in 1988 ahead of some really great bowlers.

Dude, the 1988 tour was an ATG tour, no one is disputing that. Viv didn't play the first match, but the numbers are good enough even when contextualized against a weakened lineup.
Though it should be noted that Marshall missed a game and was man of the match for the 3rd test.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Dude, the 1988 tour was an ATG tour, no one is disputing that. Viv didn't play the first match, but the numbers are good enough even when contextualized against a weakened lineup.
Though it should be noted that Marshall missed a game and was man of the match for the 3rd test.
Well you have been disputing that. You never called it such and nitpicked over it.

Now will you please acknowledge, that based on his prime record as a bowler in Aus and including WSC, Imran Khan is worldclass there?
 

Xix2565

International Regular
Imran being worldclass against one of the best teams of all time shouldn't be this difficult to say. Just like how Hadlee is the better fast bowler and also pretty great within his own right as a cricketer.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Imran being worldclass against one of the best teams of all time shouldn't be this difficult to say. Just like how Hadlee is the better fast bowler and also pretty great within his own right as a cricketer.
We all put Hadlee ahead.

@kyear2 is committed to the notion that Imran was a home bully incapable of delivering the goods abroad. Anything contrary to that, he will seek to deflect.
 

kyear2

International Coach
Literally how is it different mate? Imran's stats in Australia would look quite a bit better if you included wsc numbers and would add to his legacy just like Viv's did. I don't even know what you mean here. Why is it ok to consider those games as a positive when talking about Viv but when it comes to Imran it's ignored.

You hold up WSC as the highest level of cricket too unlike me, so to completely ignore the fact that Imran was extremely successful in the few games he played there seems unfair.
Adding WSC games to his record, does enhance it. It still doesn't explain however why he averaged 28 in Australia during his career.

These are two separate issues.

There isn't a player here that receives the level of converted "contextualization" that Imran does. And it's warranted for almost every player in some context.

There's this effort to portray him as perfect somehow and it's honestly disconcerting.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Adding WSC games to his record, does enhance it. It still doesn't explain however why he averaged 28 in Australia during his career.
You are flat out contradicting yourself. 'Yeah he he do great with WSC, but why didn't he do great without it?'

The whole point is to see how good a bowler was in a country. You don't exclude the series where they faced perhaps the toughest test there and then make your judgement. It's as simple as that.

There isn't a player here that receives the level of converted "contextualization" that Imran does. And it's warranted for almost every player in some context.

There's this effort to portray him as perfect somehow and it's honestly disconcerting.
Nobody is portraying him as perfect. All of us voted for Hadlee over Imran as a pacer. You're the one who is just dedicated to downgrading him.

Imran gets context because he was an unusual cricketer who started as a pure bowler, became an AR and ended as a pure bat. Nobody else was like that.
 

kyear2

International Coach
No, I don't care to change your mind. I just am pointing out how laughable, and divorced from reality of watching cricket, this particular take is. There's only a handful of bowlers who could perform away in West Indies at a high level during their heyday, which ankitj showed evidence of.

We're talking about one of the absolute most successful bowlers against the high level West Indies side over any sustained period playing there, and who didn't just perform well statistically, but also won matches.

In the face of that, and knowing you're a West Indies fan (presumably from there too, I'm guessing?), it's now becoming more clear that there's a certain amount of salt that's emanating from your takes.

It's okay dude, it's been almost 40 years since Imran blasted through your heroes.
You're one of the few posters whose take i generally respect the least, if at all, and somehow this is probably your worst and most pathetic yet.

The insularity exhibited in some of these threads have reached a new low, and I generally try to stay out of some of them, but this is laughable.

You believe I'm salty from a tied series that was played in 1988? I would ask if you've lost your mind, but that would be moot.

I don't take these things as seriously or nearly as personally as you guys do, this for me is a getaway from work to talk about, conveniently, 4 of the sports I love.

But as I've mentioned quite a bit recently the arguments have become based on players rather than philosophy or in some cases reality. It's also become so personality based and everyone out to get the posters they don't like, that it's become childish and toxic.

Subs has to be right and prove somehow that his national heroes are seen as the absolute best. I mean, he hasssss to be right, recognized as being right and it be accepted that he's converted others. It's primarily all about Imran, Wasim and Tendulkar a bit in-between, but all about Imran. He's relentlessly targeted any player that can be seen as a challenger, either as a bowler or all rounder, with Ambrose and Kallis being the primary targets, and Steyn to a lesser extent. He's recently started on Hadlee, but don't imagine that one would get too far either.

Smali actively dislikes me because I would dare say something bad about Imran, and swears I came into the thread to disparage him. Despite the fact that Imran regularly featured in my team's until I recognized that his numbers didn't make any sense. He was like the reverse Akram.

But back to your small and insular point, I respected Ponting and McGrath, I mean Pigeon could be a dick, and they beat the hell out of us. But I admired the skills of the two men, and how they played.

The problem is that you think I think like you do, I don't. We suck right now, I left home and 63 for 3 a f by the time I made it to the office it was curtains. Coronis bashes Viv daily, I don't care, it's his opinions. Why must this group think behavior continue?

We can argue points without the bullying mentality or growing personal dislike because of beliefs over retired cricketers.

That fact that two people even liked you post is sad beyond belief but proof of what I'm speaking of, but can't say I'm surprised by any of them.

This is supposed to be fun.
 

kyear2

International Coach
Anyways, since none of the other posts here are worth responding to, I'll share an image I took tonight of an approaching comet. It's only been discovered this year, and it's likely travelled millions of years from the ort cloud.

It's about 300 million km from earth, about twice our distance from the sun or 2 AU.

It's not expected to complete the journey and will break up as it attempts to turn to leave the sun's gravitational pull.
Screenshot_2024-07-10-23-08-13-32_6012fa4d4ddec268fc5c7112cbb265e7.jpg
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
I don't take these things as seriously or nearly as personally as you guys do
Sure you don't.

How the **** is that benching Sobers, are u being deliberately daft?
You literally post the most ridiculous ****, all to reach your preconceived agendas. You're literally telling me what I have in my head.

Like literally what the hell is wrong with you.
How the **** are you telling me what I believe? You are seriously irritating though.

You can kindly assume what ever the **** you like. I genuinely don't care.
 

shortpitched713

International Captain
You're one of the few posters whose take i generally respect the least, if at all, and somehow this is probably your worst and most pathetic yet.

The insularity exhibited in some of these threads have reached a new low, and I generally try to stay out of some of them, but this is laughable.

You believe I'm salty from a tied series that was played in 1988? I would ask if you've lost your mind, but that would be moot.

I don't take these things as seriously or nearly as personally as you guys do, this for me is a getaway from work to talk about, conveniently, 4 of the sports I love.

But as I've mentioned quite a bit recently the arguments have become based on players rather than philosophy or in some cases reality. It's also become so personality based and everyone out to get the posters they don't like, that it's become childish and toxic.

Subs has to be right and prove somehow that his national heroes are seen as the absolute best. I mean, he hasssss to be right, recognized as being right and it be accepted that he's converted others. It's primarily all about Imran, Wasim and Tendulkar a bit in-between, but all about Imran. He's relentlessly targeted any player that can be seen as a challenger, either as a bowler or all rounder, with Ambrose and Kallis being the primary targets, and Steyn to a lesser extent. He's recently started on Hadlee, but don't imagine that one would get too far either.

Smali actively dislikes me because I would dare say something bad about Imran, and swears I came into the thread to disparage him. Despite the fact that Imran regularly featured in my team's until I recognized that his numbers didn't make any sense. He was like the reverse Akram.

But back to your small and insular point, I respected Ponting and McGrath, I mean Pigeon could be a dick, and they beat the hell out of us. But I admired the skills of the two men, and how they played.

The problem is that you think I think like you do, I don't. We suck right now, I left home and 63 for 3 a f by the time I made it to the office it was curtains. Coronis bashes Viv daily, I don't care, it's his opinions. Why must this group think behavior continue?

We can argue points without the bullying mentality or growing personal dislike because of beliefs over retired cricketers.

That fact that two people even liked you post is sad beyond belief but proof of what I'm speaking of, but can't say I'm surprised by any of them.

This is supposed to be fun.
Trust me, I generally don't take it seriously either. Sometimes I can get in a trolling mode, but cricket of all things, is the least of the things that can set me off over the edge. Don't take it personal, as I've taken similar snipes as subs when I've found one of his particular opinions delulu.

That said, you understand why it's even a context which would be considered to tack on an additional run tax to an average threshold to be considered great, right? It's because the West Indies were the ****ing best, and they didn't get that reputation by rolling over to any given bowling attack that turned up. Generally everyone would do worse than their normal record because, duh. You should take the complement for your side.

But there's no luck or whatever to the record of Imran in the West Indies, that could likely be sustained over the course of 16 innings bowled there. He was clearly one of the best touring bowlers who ever came to the West Indies. And these are the kind of performances where if you're there, you'd feel compelled to applaud even an opposing player.

Instead of celebrating the good cricket all around that those series represented, and accepting the complement to your team's standard that we would consider a relatively higher average still indicative of ATG performance, you instead go full curmudgeon.

What's up with that?
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Trust me, I generally don't take it seriously either. Sometimes I can get in a trolling mode, but cricket of all things, is the least of the things that can set me off over the edge. Don't take it personal, as I've taken similar snipes as subs when I've found one of his particular opinions delulu.

That said, you understand why it's even a context which would be considered to tack on an additional run tax to an average threshold to be considered great, right? It's because the West Indies were the ****ing best, and they didn't get that reputation by rolling over to any given bowling attack that turned up. Generally everyone would do worse than their normal record because, duh. You should take the complement for your side.

But there's no luck or whatever to the record of Imran in the West Indies, that could likely be sustained over the course of 16 innings bowled there. He was clearly one of the best touring bowlers who ever came to the West Indies. And these are the kind of performances where if you're there, you'd feel compelled to applaud even an opposing player.

Instead of celebrating the good cricket all around that those series represented, and accepting the complement to your team's standard that we would consider a relatively higher average still indicative of ATG performance, you instead go full curmudgeon.

What's up with that?
Dude, you all don't understand the existential crisis our buddy @kyear2 is having. Lemme lay it out.

Kyears cricket worldview centers around hierarchies. There are great pantheons of cricketers and each bowler and bat has a designated place in this sacred ladder. He views this with hallowed reverence. It is an honor to be in the highest echelon.

Many years ago, he held the same cursory high opinion we all have of Imran, putting him in near the top. Only then he heard about ball tampering, and took it as a personal affront. How dare this scoundrel try and claw his way to the top of these legends?

So he made it in his personal mission to deny Imran those highest accolades. Cheaters shouldn't win. This was a threefold strategy. Deny his suitability as a bowler among the top tier, downplay his batting and dismiss his captaincy. And he proceeded hence with his strategy.

Only recently, cracks have started emerging. He has realised digging into his record that Imran cannot be knocked down so easily. To maintain his intellectual credibility, he has been forced to make concessions.

On batting, rather than pretend Imran was just a useful tail who scored on dead pitches, he has conceded that he is the only one with serious lower order batting credentials among the ARs.

On captaincy, he has been forced to concede that Imran did impact Pak's struggling team and that captaincy actually does account for a good deal for results. He hasn't quite closed the loop yet on that, but soon with time, we are working with him.

He also recently selected Imran as no.8 in his ATG time, essentially dismissing his own point that a lower order AR like him wouldn't be a good fit.

The last reserve to downplay Imran is his bowling. He cannot, CANNOT concede there, because if he does, it's game over. He will be forced to see what we all do, Imran was a top pacer with no gulf with the others, and denying him a front row seat in the cricketing pantheon doesn't make sense.

He can only make his case for Imran as a bowler if he says that he was a home bully and his away record doesn't merit serious consideration. Yet even there, has just admitted that Imran in England does have a worldclass record.

So now it all goes down to Imran in WI and Aus. He needs to stick to his guns on this because if not, Imran will be seen as as accomplished away as anyone else, cheaters will win, Imran gets his props, and all those years of posting go down the drain.

So please be patient with our buddy Kyear, this is an existential issue for him.
 
Last edited:

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Anyways, since none of the other posts here are worth responding to, I'll share an image I took tonight of an approaching comet. It's only been discovered this year, and it's likely travelled millions of years from the ort cloud.

It's about 300 million km from earth, about twice our distance from the sun or 2 AU.

It's not expected to complete the journey and will break up as it attempts to turn to leave the sun's gravitational pull.
View attachment 40841
If the comet escaping the suns gravitational pull is a metaphor for you avoiding posts questioning your cricket opinions, this is an all timer of a post.
 

Swamp Witch Hattie

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
Anyways, since none of the other posts here are worth responding to, I'll share an image I took tonight of an approaching comet. It's only been discovered this year, and it's likely travelled millions of years from the ort cloud.

It's about 300 million km from earth, about twice our distance from the sun or 2 AU.

It's not expected to complete the journey and will break up as it attempts to turn to leave the sun's gravitational pull.
View attachment 40841
When that comet arcs around the Sun, it won't be because of gravity, it'll be because Imran is on it and scratching away at it like it's an old ball, also causing it to break up! Afterwards, he'll be posthumously awarded the ultimate accolade of Player of the Solar System for his efforts!
 

Top