• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Miller: six or out?

Victor Ian

Victor Ian

International Coach
Daemon said:
the patch of yellow could have been from another days play. Maybe they relayed the boundary after that.
Click to expand...
that's exactly the explanation. the patch of yellow is fatigued grass rather than a faded chalk line. so why move it at all? something is suss.
 
centurymaker

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
Victor Ian said:
this is clearly a deep fake. they didnt have the time to create all the frames and still had to obscure the critical foot behind a score thing.
Click to expand...
You can believe the Earth is flat if you want. Live in denial while all proof points in the other direction.

There are other aerial videos proving the same thing. No point posting anything given how salty some people are. It must hurt. :laugh: Even on the channel I was watching they showed an aerial shot later where you could make out a definite gap between boundary and foot.
 
Victor Ian

Victor Ian

International Coach
centurymaker said:
You can believe the Earth is flat if you want. Live in denial while all proof points in the other direction.

There are other aerial videos proving the same thing. No point posting anything given how salty some people are. It must hurt. :laugh: Even on the channel I was watching they showed an aerial shot later where you could make out a definite gap between boundary and foot.
Click to expand...
yeah, but where are these aerial videos coming from. cameras are not floating in the air. that alone is proof that this video is fake. you need to wake up and smell the grass!

edit: my team was not even in the finals, so i am well placed to be an impartial observer. no salt here.
 
flibbertyjibber

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Daemon said:
the patch of yellow could have been from another days play. Maybe they relayed the boundary after that.
Click to expand...
I've no idea if it was moved by a sliding fielder and not put back or a previous match but there was a lot of disgruntled Saffers online claiming a conspiracy theory after the match.
 
Victor Ian

Victor Ian

International Coach
It was too regular to have been moved from a sliding incident. Therefore the only option is the Indian board cheated before the game by having the boundary repositioned outside of the minimum klassen 6 distance. It just reeks. Also strange that every video purporting to show it was clearly a legal catch has some section of the feet obscured, whether by scorecard, or sight screen or other shenanigans.
 
Dendarii

Dendarii

International Debutant
flibbertyjibber said:
I've no idea if it was moved by a sliding fielder and not put back or a previous match but there was a lot of disgruntled Saffers online claiming a conspiracy theory after the match.
Click to expand...
Which is nonsense. The entire process of taking the catch was based on where the boundary was at that moment, but if it had been put back then he would have adjusted what he did based on that positioning. It would have meant that he'd have to have taken the catch a bit higher, but at this level that's not really an issue.
 
sledger

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
Dendarii said:
Which is nonsense. The entire process of taking the catch was based on where the boundary was at that moment, but if it had been put back then he would have adjusted what he did based on that positioning. It would have meant that he'd have to have taken the catch a bit higher, but at this level that's not really an issue.
Click to expand...
You can't know this for sure though.
 
Victor Ian

Victor Ian

International Coach
Dendarii said:
Which is nonsense. The entire process of taking the catch was based on where the boundary was at that moment, but if it had been put back then he would have adjusted what he did based on that positioning. It would have meant that he'd have to have taken the catch a bit higher, but at this level that's not really an issue.
Click to expand...
Doesn't work. If he took the catch higher he has less leverage to throw it up the be caught again easily.
 
centurymaker

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
Victor Ian said:
It was too regular to have been moved from a sliding incident. Therefore the only option is the Indian board cheated before the game by having the boundary repositioned outside of the minimum klassen 6 distance. It just reeks. Also strange that every video purporting to show it was clearly a legal catch has some section of the feet obscured, whether by scorecard, or sight screen or other shenanigans.
Click to expand...
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1808118168554291458


These 2 videos have nothing obstructing his feet.
 
Last edited:
GIMH

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
I think the only reasonable action is to expunge the tournament and England remain reigning champs
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top