PlayerComparisons
International Captain
Two ATG slow bowlers
Barnes bowled both leg cutter and off cutter. He also bowled inswingers and outswingers. Heard that he could bowl a delivery which would swing away from the batter and then cut into the batsman and vice versa. So he could move the ball in both ways both in the air and of the pitch. So he really didn't need the googly.Bradman was of the opinion that Tiger was the greater bowler because he bowled every delivery Barnes did, plus he had a wrong 'un, which SFB did not.
There's a possibly apocryphal story I really hope is true as it fits my mental image of him perfectly, that, when told of Sir Donald's opinion, Barnes replied,
"It's quite true, I never bowled the 'googly'...I never needed it."
...so you're saying that Barnes was inimitable?Barnes' style is extinct, wheras O'Reilly was a progenitor of one of the most important spin styles to this day. Enough said.
Seriously?Barnes' style is extinct, wheras O'Reilly was a progenitor of one of the most important spin styles to this day. Enough said.
Yes, he was a Model T Ford to O'Reilly's jet airplane....so you're saying that Barnes was inimitable?
I don't mean he literally invented wrist spin, just that he ( and Grimmett ) really demonstrated it's use and versatility as an all conditions bowling style, in a way that I can't recall any before them did. There's probably a better word than "progenitor" for that, so my b on that.Seriously?
Bert VoglerI don't mean he literally invented wrist spin, just that he ( and Grimmett ) really demonstrated it's use and versatility as an all conditions bowling style, in a way that I can't recall any before them did. There's probably a better word than "progenitor" for that, so my b on that.
IMHO, not really as impressive, but certainly more of a pioneer.Bert Vogler
I mean, he definitely wasn't as good as O'Reilly; but fits the pioneer role much better; and also the whole "Googly mystery" thingy.IMHO, not really as impressive, but certainly more of a pioneer.
Yeah that line wins it for meThere's a possibly apocryphal story I really hope is true as it fits my mental image of him perfectly, that, when told of Sir Donald's opinion, Barnes replied,
"It's quite true, I never bowled the 'googly'...I never needed it."
Is it? From what I've read about Barnes, he seems to me to be quite similar to a Mustafizur type of bowler, although others can correct me if I'm completely wrong.Barnes' style is extinct
It really isn't, in 50s you had Bedser/Fazal and then in 2000s I think Vern was quite similar to him but quicker, I reckon Barnes was 110s and Vern 120sIs it? From what I've read about Barnes, he seems to me to be quite similar to a Mustafizur type of bowler, although others can correct me if I'm completely wrong.
Reading about his cutters and delivery types, he seemed more similar to the Fizz for meIt really isn't, in 50s you had Bedser/Fazal and then in 2000s I think Vern was quite similar to him but quicker, I reckon Barnes was 110s and Vern 120s