• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

3rd Greatest 19 century cricketer

Who is the 3rd greatest 19th century cricketer?

  • Fuller Pilch

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • William Lillywhite

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Alfred Shaw

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • John Wisden

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Charlie Turner

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • J.J. Ferris

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Stanley Jackson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Johnny Briggs

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Bobby Peel

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Jack Blackham

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Hugh Trumble

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    9

sayon basak

International Debutant
Who do you think is the 3rd Greatest cricketer of the 19th century after WG Grace and George Lohmann?
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
Lohman wasn't the second greatest really. Spofforth was almost undisputedly considered better, Lohman's average is pleasantly boosted by his matches against a SA team that wasn't Test standard. Also, shouldn't Ranji count?? And Briggs, Peel, Trumble, Steel, Fry and Blackham should be in the poll too.
 

Yeoman

U19 Captain
I went for Shrewsbury as probably the second best batsman after Grace in the pre-modern era, which I would define as ending around 1890 in England. Jackson, Ranji and Fry belong to the later, 1890-1914 ‘Golden Age’ in my book. The bowlers from the pre 1890 period have fantastic figures on paper however they were greatly aided by favourable pitches.

The likes of Mynn, Felix and Pilch from the mid 19th century round arm era I find very hard to compare to later players of the over arm era.
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
I went for Shrewsbury as probably the second best batsman after Grace in the pre-modern era, which I would define as starting around 1890 in England. Jackson, Ranji and Fry belong to the later, 1890-1914 ‘Golden Age’ in my book. The bowlers from the pre 1890 period have fantastic figures on paper however they were greatly aided by favourable pitches.

The likes of Mann, Felix and Pilch from the mid 19th century round arm era I find very hard to compare to later players of the over arm era.
It's especially hard to rate someone like Alfred Mynn, but as the question is greater not better, I think he has a notable advantage as the undisputed GoAT pre Grace.
 

peterhrt

U19 Captain
Lohman's average is pleasantly boosted by his matches against a SA team that wasn't Test standard.
Wisden was strongly opposed to any of the 19th century South Africa v England matches being counted as Tests, and maintained their position until after WW2. The games weren't even considered the equivalent of first-class at the time.

For the purposes of assessing English cricketers, especially bowlers like Lohmann and Briggs, it is sensible to ignore these matches.
 

Brook's side

International Regular
Wisden was strongly opposed to any of the 19th century South Africa v England matches being counted as Tests, and maintained their position until after WW2. The games weren't even considered the equivalent of first-class at the time.

For the purposes of assessing English cricketers, especially bowlers like Lohmann and Briggs, it is sensible to ignore these matches.
They were played on mats weren't they?
 

Brook's side

International Regular
So of my notes on the leading bowlers:

*fast bowler George Lohmann averaged 10.8 in tests and 13.7 1st class.
*JJ Ferris averaged 12.7 in tests across the same decades as Lohmann.
*Johny Briggs took 55 test wickets in the 1880s @ 7.9, yet in the 1890s inexplicably averaged only 26.
*Lohmann's 1st class average (which was arguably more significant in this era that test matches figures) was beaten by his unheralded contemporary Fred Morley (13.4).
*Lohmann’s 1st class strike rate was beaten by Fredd Spofforth (35.8 v 38.9).


George A Lohmann (England) 1886-1896 Right Arm Fast Medium
"Rated by contemporaries as the most difficult opponent, he bowled at little more than medium pace but was able to make the ball seam both ways, and his constant experimentation led to variations in angle, flight and pace. Add into the equation his metronomic accuracy, and he was often unplayable. " Martin Williamson ESPNCricinfo

he holds the lowest lifetime Test bowling average among bowlers with more than fifteen wickets and…the second highest peak rating for a bowler in the ICC ratings. He also holds the record for the lowest strike rate…in all Test historyWikipedia. Photo: Wikipedia
1718656743638.png


Hugh Trumble (Australia) 1890-1904 Right Arm Off-Break
…could take wickets in all conditions. On the wet pitches often found in those days, especially the sticky wickets in his native Australia he was virtually unplayable. A tall man, he bowled offspin at close to medium pace with considerable variation in flight and pace. He turned the ball enough to beat the bat on true pitches, but on a wet wicket could make the ball bite, turn and lift spitefully. He fooled many a good batsman with a well disguised slower ball often resulting in a caught and bowledDave Liverman ESPNCricinfoTrumble took 141 wickets in Test cricket—a world record at the time of his retirement…He is one of only four bowlers to twice take a hat-trick in Test cricket.” Wikipedia Photo: Wikipedia
1718656755491.png
 

peterhrt

U19 Captain
Fred Morley had retired before Lohmann made his first-class debut. Morley was more a contemporary of Alfred Shaw.

Lohmann and Turner were the leading bowlers of their time, contemporary with Ferris, Peel and Briggs. Although there was some overlap, Spofforth was earlier. The best English bowler of Spofforth's time was probably left-arm spinner Ted Peate, who was generally rated higher than either Peel or Briggs due to his deceptive flight and variations.
 

Top