Snow over Bedser is interesting but I think I agree with it.Third seamer was the big call there. Went with Snow for variety.
If it's till 1970, doesn't Barry Richards qualify??Barlow might be a better pick for SA than Goddard but Goddard is a truly underappreciated legend.
I will probably still go with Bedser, whom I rate clearly higher than Statham, Willis and Snow; Trueman and Larwood for his sheer pace, as the side need a high pacer.I actually rate Snow over Statham. Pure output probably isn't as good overall but think he has enough scope to be judged as the superior bowler. Better record v top sides and played in less bowler-friendly times. Suspect he was the more penetrative of the two on flat pitches.
Obviously a rung below FST though.
Bedser was the slowest out of them.I will probably still go with Bedser, whom I rate clearly higher than Statham, Willis and Snow; Trueman and Larwood for his sheer pace, as the side need a high pacer.
Verity was a spinnerThird seamer was the big call there. Went with Snow for variety.
Yeah, I know that.Bedser was the slowest out of them.
Barlow >> Bland (and Herbie Taylor) tbh. I'd even be tempted to take out a bowler to include him if push came to shove.Barlow might be a better pick for SA than Goddard but Goddard is a truly underappreciated legend.
7 Test Match Series held in England and New Zealand (You can choose any player of your choice) - Polar Trophy (North Pole - England, South Pole - New Zealand) will be handed by Elizabeth 2 for the winner.
Speight's and Newcastle Brown Ale with Fish and Chips are served at the Tournament.Openers: England much better
Middle order: NZ slightly better but England likely to have a better base to work from and have lefthanders for variety
Tail: NZ much better
Opening bowlers & 3rd bowler: about even (Hadlee clearly the best but Cairns the worst)
4th seamer and spinner: about even (Wagner much better than Flintoff but Swann much better than Vettori).
Keeping and slip fielding: NZ better
Captaincy: Williamson > Gooch
Overall: Close
Please make sure it is NZ fush and chups. English food is dreadful.Speight's and Newcastle Brown Ale with Fish and Chips are served at the Tournament.
itstlWagner much better than Flintoff
3-5s are close but I think I'd just take England's just. Don't quite rate Ross Taylor in the same company as the other five batters. Root slightly better than Kane imo. Crowe slightly better than Gower.Openers: England much better
Middle order: NZ slightly better but England likely to have a better base to work from and have lefthanders for variety
Tail: NZ much better
Opening bowlers & 3rd bowler: about even (Hadlee clearly the best but Cairns the worst)
4th seamer and spinner: about even (Wagner much better than Flintoff but Swann much better than Vettori).
Keeping and slip fielding: NZ better
Captaincy: Williamson > Gooch
Overall: Close
I did the rating on CF90s' teams with the pics in post #23, 932. I would select several different players if picking teams for the respective nations, and from those perhaps put England slightly ahead.3-5s are close but I think I'd just take England's just. Don't quite rate Ross Taylor in the same company as the other five batters. Root slightly better than Kane imo. Crowe slightly better than Gower.
If you take Flintoff at 8 out then NZ do have significantly better batting depth, but Broad/Gough can compete with their opposite number Wagner on bowling better.
Hadlee factor is big and he chokeslams Anderson but I'd take Willis over either one of Southee/Boult and either one of Underwood/Swann a long way ahead of Vettori.