Chubb
International Regular
He's had a very strong career by Bangladesh standards and is a lock in for their all-time XI, I don't think he wasted his ability.Mominul Haque?
He's had a very strong career by Bangladesh standards and is a lock in for their all-time XI, I don't think he wasted his ability.Mominul Haque?
I thought Yasir Hameed looked really good. Very pleasing technique to the eyeInsert every other wannabe opener from Pakistan from the 200s/early 2010s.
He absolutely got "found out" to a large extent. He averaged 13 in his first year of ODI cricket because no one could figure out what he was doing. Then they did. Basically the definition of "found out".injuries were the real reason why he faded
anyone claiming he got “found out” is resorting to lazy cliches as usual
no he wasnt going to average sub 15 for the rest of his life but claiming that it was his baseline which no spinner has ever done in odi history as a career avg and him reverting to regular figures is him being found out is ridiculous. he had plenty of notable performances after being “found out” including a 4 wicket haul in the 2012 world cup final which defies your logicHe absolutely got "found out" to a large extent. He averaged 13 in his first year of ODI cricket because no one could figure out what he was doing. Then they did. Basically the definition of "found out".
Injuries would have affected his availability and career somewhat but it's a massive stretch to think he would have gone on and cleaned up averaging sub 15 for 10+ years without injury
failing to realise your potential doesn’t necessarily make you a failed player. Someone like Mark Waugh for example had more potential than Steve Waugh, but Mark didn’t live up to his potential, nor was he a failure.no he wasnt going to average sub 15 for the rest of his life but claiming that it was his baseline which no spinner has ever done in odi history as a career avg and him reverting to regular figures is him being found out is ridiculous. he had plenty of notable performances after being “found out” including a 4 wicket haul in the 2012 world cup final which defies your logic
its the equivalent of saying that Mike Hussey got found because he didnt average 80 like he did in his 1st 2 years of test cricket
injuries massively affected his career, they ended his international career and forced him to turn into a weird batsman batting all rounder hybrid at domestic level
in any case many of this thread suggestions for failed players dont even qualify for failures in the 1st place
What I mean by this is that for a little while early on it seemed like he would become a true great - analogous to, if not as skilled as Flower for Zimbabwe. But ended up not being able to hold a bat away from his home grounds. (impressive home record of course)He's had a very strong career by Bangladesh standards and is a lock in for their all-time XI, I don't think he wasted his ability.
im aware, it makes almost 80% of cricketers eligible for this list other than the technically ugly grafters and grinders who got by primarily on grit and perseverance which defeats the purpose of the threadfailing to realise your potential doesn’t necessarily make you a failed player. Someone like Mark Waugh for example had more potential than Steve Waugh, but Mark didn’t live up to his potential, nor was he a failure.
Not sure if this is trueSomeone like Mark Waugh for example had more potential than Steve Waugh
It always seemed to be what I heard. iirc Steve was picked earlier based on his bowling too.Not sure if this is true
That's what being found out is, or when people say he was, that's what they mean. It doesn't mean he became terrible and useless. Just not as effective as he was before he was found out.no he wasnt going to average sub 15 for the rest of his life but claiming that it was his baseline which no spinner has ever done in odi history as a career avg and him reverting to regular figures is him being found out is ridiculous.
The reason why people say it about Mendis is because he had a very peculiar style of bowling that wasn't seen in international cricket very often and he spammed carrom balls, which are specifically the kind of delivery that can throw off batsmen when they haven't seen it before but are notoriously easy to handle once you're used to it because they barely spin and are very easy to pick out of the hand once they realised what he was doing. "Found out" is a pretty apt description of what happened.no he wasnt going to average sub 15 for the rest of his life but claiming that it was his baseline which no spinner has ever done in odi history as a career avg and him reverting to regular figures is him being found out is ridiculous. he had plenty of notable performances after being “found out” including a 4 wicket haul in the 2012 world cup final which defies your logic
its the equivalent of saying that Mike Hussey got found because he didnt average 80 like he did in his 1st 2 years of test cricket
Yeah, not sure what @Socerer 01's getting at. 'Mystery' styles often go through a phase where they can dismiss batsmen through variation alone, but the batsmen learn to pick them or find a way around - i.e. they get found out. Then bowlers have to think about their tactics to keep up their performance - some pass that test better than others. For instance, this happened with the googly.The reason why people say it about Mendis is because he had a very peculiar style of bowling that wasn't seen in international cricket very often and he spammed carrom balls, which are specifically the kind of delivery that can throw off batsmen when they haven't seen it before but are notoriously easy to handle once you're used to it because they barely spin and are very easy to pick out of the hand once they realised what he was doing. "Found out" is a pretty apt description of what happened.
From memory he also wasn't that useful away from turning wickets because, as you said, his turn was very slight and subtle. On a typical Australian pitch for example his variations ended up being straight balls just bowled with different actionsYeah, not sure what @Socerer 01's getting at. 'Mystery' styles often go through a phase where they can dismiss batsmen through variation alone, but the batsmen learn to pick them or find a way around - i.e. they get found out. Then bowlers have to think about their tactics to keep up their performance - some pass that test better than others. For instance, this happened with the googly.
In Mendis' case (and just refreshing myself with some video, it's been a couple of years) he bowled normal off breaks and used the 'carrom' grip to bowl gentle legbreaks and googlies - the legbreaks often with backspin, which made them slide. The disadvantage is he didn't use the wrist as much as a normal leg or off spinner, putting fewer revs on the ball.
That's what being found out is, or when people say he was, that's what they mean. It doesn't mean he became terrible and useless. Just not as effective as he was before he was found out.
sounds like we have different interpretations of what found out means, fair enoughThe reason why people say it about Mendis is because he had a very peculiar style of bowling that wasn't seen in international cricket very often and he spammed carrom balls, which are specifically the kind of delivery that can throw off batsmen when they haven't seen it before but are notoriously easy to handle once you're used to it because they barely spin and are very easy to pick out of the hand once they realised what he was doing. "Found out" is a pretty apt description of what happened.
what I was getting at was that Mendis “failed” because of a chronic back issue and not because his primary mystery weapon was becoming staleYeah, not sure what @Socerer 01's getting at. 'Mystery' styles often go through a phase where they can dismiss batsmen through variation alone, but the batsmen learn to pick them or find a way around - i.e. they get found out. Then bowlers have to think about their tactics to keep up their performance - some pass that test better than others. For instance, this happened with the googly.
Him and Taufeeq Umar were the main decent ones.I thought Yasir Hameed looked really good. Very pleasing technique to the eye
How rapid was Foottit? I remember his name in the mix for an England call up.Mal Loye, Mark Foottit, Chris Lewis, Devon Malcolm.
And just because they inexplixably never got the chance to play for England, David Sales and Glen Chapple.