To get this thread back on track, here is an England AT ODI XI.
With ODI xi's, I always have an issue with a fair conversion factor for batting SRs for players who played before the modern era. In the 80s/90 - a SR of ~70 was good - typical for a good player, but that is terrible now. It is unfair to assume previous players could not make an adjustment to modern rules - so you have to [mentally at least] adjust their SR stats to reflect [realistically] what one might do today. I tend to take the average score for an era [say 240 in the 90s], and see where a batsman stands in relation to that SR (eg 80 in this example) and adjust accordingly. Ie if he was above that - apply the difference etc. Ditto for bowlers ERs. Hope that makes sense. I teach Literature, not Maths.
In any case:
Buttler +
Bairstow
Root
KP
Morgan *
Stokes
Flintoff
Botham
Swann
Gough
Willis
I think that is an incredible team. Reflects the reality of England's recent rise in LOI cricket - with players I think would make the jump between eras/add more than their numbers. Sad to keep some icons of bygone eras out: Lamb, Fairbrother etc - but I reckon that's the most powerful line-up England could field. 3 top ARs adds depth to both departments.