Migara
International Coach
Sure. Should be corrected as NZL. Averaged 15.3 Wasn't flashy in Pakistan too averaging 33.8Lloyd wasn't very poor in WI.
Sure. Should be corrected as NZL. Averaged 15.3 Wasn't flashy in Pakistan too averaging 33.8Lloyd wasn't very poor in WI.
Small sample in Pak. Was outstanding in India.Sure. Should be corrected as NZL. Averaged 15.3 Wasn't flashy in Pakistan too averaging 33.8
Richards and Sobers also have a very bad record in NZ.Sure. Should be corrected as NZL. Averaged 15.3 Wasn't flashy in Pakistan too averaging 33.8
Harsh. I also sometimes post memes about Himannv's irrational dislike of Sangakkara and praise Jadeja in threads where subshakerz is active.Every RIS CC post
Everton Weekes scored 3 successive 100s on the 1956 tour. Thankfully he had a double failure in the 4th and final test in Auckland and NZ then won its 1st test match after 26 years of trying.Yeah its interesting, lots of notable Windies players have struggled in NZ, both batsmen and bowlers. Notable exceptions include Greenidge, Walsh and Garner.
And Hadlee happened too in 80s.Everton Weekes scored 3 successive 100s on the 1956 tour. Thankfully he had a double failure in the 4th and final test in Auckland and NZ then won its 1st test match after 26 years of trying.
Pre 1986/7 all WI tours were tacked on the end of an Australian tour. I've read that the West Indian players struggled with the colder weather, slower/lower/seamier pitches (can't just hit through the line), and less interest/hype in cricket in comparison to Australia.
Richards played one 3 test series. Really??Richards and Sobers also have a very bad record in NZ.
Yeah the bowlers and batsmen both preferred the harder Australian wicketsEverton Weekes scored 3 successive 100s on the 1956 tour. Thankfully he had a double failure in the 4th and final test in Auckland and NZ then won its 1st test match after 26 years of trying.
Pre 1986/7 all WI tours were tacked on the end of an Australian tour. I've read that the West Indian players struggled with the colder weather, slower/lower/seamier pitches (can't just hit through the line), and less interest/hype in cricket in comparison to Australia.
Well yeah I wasn’t really counting the 3 W’s much because NZ were completely awful in the 50’s - 1 win, 21 losses,10 draws batting average of 19.75 and a bowling average of 37.78. Only 1 batsmen who played 10 matches averaged above 30, 0 bowlers who played 10 matches averaged below 30.Everton Weekes scored 3 successive 100s on the 1956 tour. Thankfully he had a double failure in the 4th and final test in Auckland and NZ then won its 1st test match after 26 years of trying.
Pre 1986/7 all WI tours were tacked on the end of an Australian tour. I've read that the West Indian players struggled with the colder weather, slower/lower/seamier pitches (can't just hit through the line), and less interest/hype in cricket in comparison to Australia.
Modus operandi. They bowled what WI traditionally disliked. Up and there and there abouts, with not much pace to work with.Yeah its interesting, lots of notable Windies players have struggled in NZ, both batsmen and bowlers. Notable exceptions include Greenidge, Walsh and Garner.
India wasn't the challenge though. Pakistan was. Had pace and had spin. And had some never say die players like Javed and Mushtaq.Small sample in Pak. Was outstanding in India.
Dire v NZ though which does count against him. Batting 5-6 a lot was favourable but he scored plenty of tough runs and crunch hundreds.
I wouldn't disregard India as not being a challenge. His two hundreds in 1974 came against three members of the spin quartet. Big hundreds too. Took control of both tests.India wasn't the challenge though. Pakistan was. Had pace and had spin. And had some never say die players like Javed and Mushtaq.
You don't know what you're talking about. Explain why some of the bowlers sucked there then. Truth be told, prior to the 80s, as has been pointed out Aust/Nz tours were usually combined and after the gruel of Australia, you know the rest. And everyone simply has a boogy team that they struggled against. For every Sobers or Lloyd who did bad in NZ, there is a : Gayle, Weekes, Chanderpaul, Greenidge etc who did well there.Modus operandi. They bowled what WI traditionally disliked. Up and there and there abouts, with not much pace to work with.
Really he was bad on those 3 Tests..... I just commented how the two best WI batsmen have a bad record there. Not that it was pointing to a weakness or anything, that's a separate discussion.Richards played one 3 test series. Really??
India certainly were a challenge especially with the quartet. And when WI got absolutely demolished in Australia in 1976, Lloyd made runs vs a rampaging Thompson and Lillee.I wouldn't disregard India as not being a challenge. His two hundreds in 1974 came against three members of the spin quartet. Big hundreds too. Took control of both tests.
Came in at 42-4 in Kolkata (1983) and made 161*. Kapil Dev bowled superbly in that series and took 4/91 in that innings.
Lloyd was excellent in Australia and India. Very decent in England and at home too. Good credentials in the subcontinent and outside. Two tiers above Mahela Jayawardene as a test bat for me.India certainly were a challenge especially with the quartet. And when WI got absolutely demolished in Australia in 1976, Lloyd made runs vs a rampaging Thompson and Lillee.
Sobers is valid since he played so many tests there. Lara wasn't too good there either (averaged 36 odd) but imo, that's misleading. In two prior series Lara did just fine in NZ. Then in the 3rd to last series of his career, he faced a rampaging Shane Bond and struggled. To put things in perspective, that same NZ attack absolutely destroyed a much better Indian batting line up 3 years prior.Really he was bad on those 3 Tests..... I just commented how the two best WI batsmen have a bad record there. Not that it was pointing to a weakness or anything, that's a separate discussion.