Flem274*
123/5
It isn'tDebatable when Pollock and Mahmood around.
It isn'tDebatable when Pollock and Mahmood around.
Yeah it's the oppositeIt isn't
Well it's not the case. The international teams from SC, the selection is biased on playing pace. There are enough FC batsmen who will take bowlers like Root for lunch every day. But they are pretty poor against pace and rarely selected, unless they are all rounders or keepers.Pretty sure it's the opposite
part-timers like Joe Root and Michael Clarke turn into front-liners when touring the subcontinent
Could be partly due to the pitches prepared for SENA teams when touring though
You said part-time spin might work in other countries, not the SC. Evidence overwhelmingly suggests the opposite. Part time spinners tend to be more effective in the SC than elsewhere, it happens nearly every tour.Well it's not the case. The international teams from SC, the selection is biased on playing pace. There are enough FC batsmen who will take bowlers like Root for lunch every day. But they are pretty poor against pace and rarely selected, unless they are all rounders or keepers.
Debatable when Pollock and Mahmood around.
Haha, yeah. I was fkn baffled reading the first few posts in the thread as I mostly remember 00s Kiwi posters roundly rimming him. I've always had the impression he was some sort of generational great since then.This thread warms my heart. You'd never know that back in the 2000s CW was on Vettori's nuts deluxe and I was his only SMART and CORRECT hater.
They are not bowling to the best players of spin that the country have to offer. Get SENA part time spinners (or even main ones) in a FC team in Asia, they will get annihilated by batsmen who could not cut the international side because they are poor against pace, but exceptional against spin. (of course if it is not Warne or a similar quality spinner).You said part-time spin might work in other countries, not the SC. Evidence overwhelmingly suggests the opposite. Part time spinners tend to be more effective in the SC than elsewhere, it happens nearly every tour.
Same goes for specialist spinners. Every time England, Australia, NZ etc. tour Asia some domestic spinner (or several) come in and do better than they do at home (if they even get a game at home, which they usually don't). And that's bowling at Asian batsmen in their home conditions. eg. Ajaz Patel, Steve O'Keefe, Kuhnemann, Murphy and the bunch that England just took to India
Maybe you're saying that part time spinners from Asia don't do so well playing for Asian teams? I assume that would be because there are more specialist spinners from the SC so you don't need part-timers as much. Either way you'd expect they would still be far more effective in the SC in more spin friendly conditions, against players not used to those conditions.
No, maybe it's debatable who was the better batsman, but it's not debatable who was the best number 8. Vettori just seemed very comfortable there and averaged 40 in that position.
Mahmood hardly ever batted at 8 and Pollock doesn't even have any 100s batting there, whilst Vettori has 4.
You're just making up arguments now as no one said Vettori was a better batsman than any of those names. Also all you did by posting those averages is back up the claim that Vettori was a great number 8.Cannot say Vettori is head and shoulders above anyone. Boucher, Holder, Cairns, Prior are definitely better bats and moved up. Vettori was stuck at 8 because he was poorer higher up
None of this makes any senseThey are not bowling to the best players of spin that the country have to offer. Get SENA part time spinners (or even main ones) in a FC team in Asia, they will get annihilated by batsmen who could not cut the international side because they are poor against pace, but exceptional against spin. (of course if it is not Warne or a similar quality spinner).
I think you don't read what I have written. SC test teams give extra ordinary weight for playing pace even in the expense of ability to play spin. Hence test teams usually are poorer than FC teams in playing spin. Get Root or Clarke in Ranji dust bowls, they will get hammered to submission by Sidhu likes or Afridi likes.None of this makes any sense
How do you explain most SENA spinners being more effective in Asia, against specialist Asian batsmen, than they are at home? The only thing I can think of is doctored pitches for touring SENA teams bringing spinners into the game more
Yeah you can.View attachment 40169
Cannot say Vettori is head and shoulders above anyone. Boucher, Holder, Cairns, Prior are definitely better bats and moved up. Vettori was stuck at 8 because he was poorer higher up
Lmao great fanficI think you don't read what I have written. SC test teams give extra ordinary weight for playing pace even in the expense of ability to play spin. Hence test teams usually are poorer than FC teams in playing spin. Get Root or Clarke in Ranji dust bowls, they will get hammered to submission by Sidhu likes or Afridi likes.
LMAO. As long as you can demonstrate SC batting lineups change significantly home vs away you are shooting empties.Lmao great fanfic
Especially like the part where they pick a batting line-up to play pace but then the wicket is a slow turner so the opposition bowls 80% of their overs with spin
Iol what are you on about now. How would SC teams playing away be relevant at all to what we are talking aboutLMAO. As long as you can demonstrate SC batting lineups change significantly home vs away you are shooting empties.
Meh, my brain hurts to the level that I have to dumb down.Iol what are you on about now. How would SC teams playing away be relevant at all to what we are talking about
Physically impossibleI have to dumb down.
I have to dumb down to the level that dumbing down is not physicalPhysically impossible