subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
Assuming we are talking the post-war period, is there any pure batting, bowling or all-round performance that can be considered better than that?
Hard to say that tbh, Botham pulled two games out from the fire that England had pretty much lost.Flintoff's right up there with Botham, isn't he? 400 runs and 24 wickets? Has nearly the same inspirational significance too.
Arguably Warne had as good a series then.Flintoff's right up there with Botham, isn't he? 400 runs and 24 wickets? Has nearly the same inspirational significance too.
What about Lara 99 or 2001? Imran 82? Hadlee 85?Statistically, there may be several that beat it (Sobers vs England in 66, Harbhajan vs Australia 01), but for clutch factor, Botham probably takes it.
Warne had a ridiculous series too. I thought this was a generally acknowledged fact.Arguably Warne had as good a series then.
As I said statistically, there may be several that beat it but Botham's ashes does have those two games where he single handedly turned certain defeat into a win.What about Lara 99 or 2001? Imran 82? Hadlee 85?
I said post-war.Obviously for batting Bradman deserves a shoutout for the 1930 Ashes. 974 runs in 7 innings, next highest was 436. Next highest on his own team was 345.
Bowling shoutout for Barnes 1913-14 tour of SA. 49 wickets in 8 innings. Next best was 19 wickets, next best on his own team was 10 wickets.
Considering he only played the first 4 tests that would change to 17 being the next highest and 7 on his own team.
Took 37% of the total wickets in those 4 tests and 62% of his teams wickets in those 4 tests.
No matter what you want to say re: competition etc the dominance these two had in their respective series was pretty crazy.
Imran also scored a decent amount of runs that series too.As I said statistically, there may be several that beat it but Botham's ashes does have those two games where he single handedly turned certain defeat into a win.
Imran's 1982 series vs India is pretty crazy in terms of how far ahead he was of every other bowler. Insane numbers:
View attachment 40131
Some others for comparison:Bowling shoutout for Barnes 1913-14 tour of SA. 49 wickets in 8 innings. Next best was 19 wickets, next best on his own team was 10 wickets.
Considering he only played the first 4 tests that would change to 17 being the next highest and 7 on his own team.
Took 37% of the total wickets in those 4 tests and 62% of his teams wickets in those 4 tests.
Whats the analysis meant to be based on?