• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

VVS vs Inzamam

Better bat

  • Total voters
    24
M

ma1978

International Debutant
The entire case for Inzamam relies on ignoring context and looking at aggregates, which is precisely what many of the same posters insist on elsewhere
 
  • Like
Reactions: J_C
S

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
ma1978 said:
The entire case for Inzamam relies on ignoring context and looking at aggregates, which is precisely what many of the same posters insist on elsewhere
Click to expand...
No. He has plenty of high value context innings too, perhaps not as many as VVS, but enough to combine with output and give him the win.

And of course, Inzi normally batted at no.4 rather than 5/6 and batted much longer in the tougher 90s.
 
OverratedSanity

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
subshakerz said:
No. He has plenty of high value context innings too, perhaps not as many as VVS, but enough to combine with output and give him the win.

And of course, Inzi normally batted at no.4 rather than 5/6 and batted much longer in the tougher 90s.
Click to expand...
Tbf, Inzi's record in the 90s was hardly spectacular. His record got way way better only after the transition to flatter pitches.

Agree he's better than VVS though, Inzi played a lot of amazing innings too, hardly some FTB who only scored soft runs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top