• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Which type of players are hardest to find ?

Most difficult category of players to find


  • Total voters
    21
  • Poll closed .

Slifer

International Captain
Funny I was thinking of something similar recently. But in the history of tests, we only have 5 openers who average 50+. And all time we only have a handful of openers who can be classified as atg. Similar for spinners and similar for wk/batsmen. Great pole!!
 

Slifer

International Captain
Let's try atg tier 1:

Atg openers: Hobbs, Sutcliffe, Hutton, Sunil

Spinners: Warne, Murali, O'Reilly,

Wk/batsmen: Gilchrist, Ames, Flower(?)
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
It's the keeper/bats but that's because the expectations of the role have changed so much. We've seen a lot more being able to keep well and effectively hold their place on batting alone lately (Watling, Pant, de Kock, Chandimal, Prior, Rizwan etc) even if they don't have the real top quality or longevity to be ATGs. I reckon we'll see more of them join that list in the next couple of decades than spinners or openers.
 

smash84

The Tiger King
Funny I was thinking of something similar recently. But in the history of tests, we only have 5 openers who average 50+. And all time we only have a handful of openers who can be classified as atg. Similar for spinners and similar for wk/batsmen. Great pole!!
You really like his pole don't you? :naughty:
 

reyrey

U19 Captain
Maybe the reason there are so few ATG great openers is because if batsman demonstrate exceptional potential as juniors then they'll probably be told to bat in the middle order.

Also potential ATG wkt/bats would probably be told to give up the gloves and bat higher up the order. If Gilchrist played for any other team in the 00s he'd probably have played as a specialist batsman and batted at 5. Similarly if AB or Sanga kept and played for 00s Australia batting at 7 then they'd probably have the numbers and body of work to be ATG wkt/bats
 

Patience and Accuracy+Gut

State Vice-Captain
Spinners probably. Openers very close 2nd too. Not to create any mess here but I legit think Barry had the potential to be ATG. For Spinners, we had a ATG in first 100 Years in O’Reilly and after Warne/ Murali era I don’t see a ATG coming in decades.
 

ataraxia

International Coach
Personally I try to keep the numbers of ATGs for each position equivalent to the number in the team (with the possible exception that involves lumping openers and MOBs together). But I suspect the answer I'm supposed to give is keepers, because given that they've been misplayed for most of the time period we consider (since WWI) I'd consider someone like de Kock to be a borderline ATG.
 

Migara

International Coach
Let's try atg tier 1:

Atg openers: Hobbs, Sutcliffe, Hutton, Sunil

Spinners: Warne, Murali, O'Reilly,

Wk/batsmen: Gilchrist, Ames, Flower(?)
Flower is a batting wicket keeper. So is Sangakkara. In addition Quinton de Koch, Dinesh Chandimal, Rishabh Pant all are in this bracket, and pick ATG out of them.

The list should have players like Healy, Russell, PJ, Bari, Latif, Kirmani, MSD or Engineer other than given above, to pick from.
 

Top