any
"I don't think the stats you are putting are in SENA pitches."
Yeah they aren't just from SENA but the difference in some of them is just too big to say "yeah well pitches" because Abd too played on flat era just like Kohli and had his proper peak after 2011 too.
"And by the way, coming to ICC events part, Kohli is being exaggerated with the stats. For AB, ICC events are of high pressure due to their pathetic display of batting."
A battinf line up with Amla(second coming of Kohli), Faf, Miller is a "pathetic" one ? Seriously dude you are just breaking reality breaks here with this.
" Kohli in ICC ODI events had great batsmen around him. Dhawan, Rohit. Earlier Sachin, Yuvraj. Kohli was not even the best for India in ODI ICC events but AB was for South Africa."
Having "better batters" around you doesn't really equate to this much gulf between runs and average. Sachin averages 50 with 85sr(3 tons and 9 50s) against SENA+Pak+SL in his time when he had **** batting partners. Kane averages 65 against SEIA+Pak in WCs too with worse line up. Your excuse doesn't hold true here bud.
And CTs??
"AB was the only half centurion with 54 in 2006 CT vs SL in tough pitch against Vaas, Murali. SA scored just 219."
So 1 innings just makes him better when he averages just 43 against top teams in all the WCs he played ??
"He scored 46 in CT 2006 Semifinal vs WI but got run out. SA lost 3 wickets after that in 39 runs. SA scored 258/8."
And WI had great "pacers" in that match like your first guidline of "against high quality pace"
"And he scored 70 vs India in 300+ chase in 2013 CT." Mclaren made 71 on that pitch and Indian attack was made up of Ishant,Bhuvi,Umesh,Jaddu and Ashwin. This is the high quality attack we are talking about here ?
I mean even Kohli made a 70+ when India was 7/1 and then12/2 against WI but the attack was just mid like India's lol.
"Can you tell except 2013 final, Kohli's one great performance under pressure in CTs ??. Even that he played because of T20 format.
The only "great" performance for Abd is that SL inning only. The WI and Ind one are failure ones along with the fact that the bowling attack was mid as hell. I mean you literally inflated the gig with "high quality" and difficult bowlers then chose absolutely normal pitches and mid attacks to showcase as Abd was fighting dragons.
"He fails under pressure in many times in ODIs. Same pattern goes to ODI WC as well."
For sure he did. 15semis, 17finals and 19semis are his **** ups but he still got 11 and 13 as decent performance either against a decent attack or on difficult pitch(13)
"His stats are great because unbeaten scoring in useless 180 chases after coming at a comfortable situation. Lol"
??? In WCs both Abd and Kohli has 1 NO against top teams where Abd averages 43.3 and Virat is at 50+.
In RPI too Kohli is at 49+ while Abd is at 45.
And what's this mental gymnastics of useless 180 chases after coming at a comfortable situation lol ?
"So stats lie here."
No they don't. It's a different case if you want to be blind though.
"And what coming to playing in SENA vs good pace attack, AB is definitely better."
Uhh then why he is behind Kohli in WCs ? Why he is so much behind against top pacers ? I mean a pitch can give you 2-5 average difference not a ****ing 10-40
Virat Kohli 200 vs SL. AB 95 vs SL. This is stats. AB faced Murali, Vaas and Malinga. VK faced?. That's what I intended to say.
