2024 Ranking of Batsmen Poll

[Prince EWS]

Bradman
Tendulkar
Hobbs

 

[Prince EWS]

Then you don’t believe in democracy.
Even in elections many candidates who have no hope of winning, get few votes

There's nothing wrong with not believing in democracy.

 

[ma1978]

It’s not a democracy and entirely L&L’s privilege to remove obvious meme votes. He’s doing us all some service by organizing this poll and if people aren’t taking it seriously in his view he has every right to use his discretion.

 

[_00_deathscar]

Jadeja
Sachin
Sobers

 

[Fuller Pilch]

Bradman
Hobbs
Tendulkar

 

[OverratedSanity]

Bradman
Smith
Tendulkar

 

[Line and Length]

Question: How come every 'crazy voter' (ie naming Jadeja or Voges as #1) names Tendulkar to the exclusion of either Hobbs or Sobers as well as Bradman. Tendulkar will gain votes on merits without these obvious cases of voting manipulation?

 

[OverratedSanity]

Question: How come every 'crazy voter' (ie naming Jadeja or Voges as #1) names Tendulkar to the exclusion of either Hobbs or Sobers as well as Bradman. Tendulkar will gain votes on merits without these obvious cases of voting manipulation?

Ignore their entire vote for 1,2,3 imo. Be ruthless, it's your poll, brother.

 

[capt_Luffy]

Question: How come every 'crazy voter' (ie naming Jadeja or Voges as #1) names Tendulkar to the exclusion of either Hobbs or Sobers as well as Bradman. Tendulkar will gain votes on merits without these obvious cases of voting manipulation?

I mean, I don't think there is really much to that. Tendulkar got 5 points, Hobbs 3 and Sobers 2 from those 3 crazy votes. Sounds about right tbh.

 

[_00_deathscar]

Question: How come every 'crazy voter' (ie naming Jadeja or Voges as #1) names Tendulkar to the exclusion of either Hobbs or Sobers as well as Bradman. Tendulkar will gain votes on merits without these obvious cases of voting manipulation?

This is racist.

 

[OverratedSanity]

This is racist.

It won't be racist if we disown you as Indian.

 

[srbhkshk]

Question: How come every 'crazy voter' (ie naming Jadeja or Voges as #1) names Tendulkar to the exclusion of either Hobbs or Sobers as well as Bradman. Tendulkar will gain votes on merits without these obvious cases of voting manipulation?

Fine.

Jadeja
Sobers
Hobbs

 

[Line and Length]

Fine.

Jadeja
Sobers
Hobbs

Nice try, but if any of you voting this way can honestly say you believe Jadeja to be the greatest batsman of all time then I might reverse my intention to ban certain members from this poll. To be honest I'm disgusted by some efforts to derail this thread.

 

[Patience and Accuracy+Gut]

Bradman
Hobbs
Sobers

 

[howitzer]

Woakes
Garner
Martin

Actually:
Bradman
Tendulkar
Sobers

 

[centurymaker]

Question: How come every 'crazy voter' (ie naming Jadeja or Voges as #1) names Tendulkar to the exclusion of either Hobbs or Sobers as well as Bradman. Tendulkar will gain votes on merits without these obvious cases of voting manipulation?

People have the right to vote however they want. Being the admin you need not influence others as you are basically projecting your stuff on others.

 

[honestbharani]

The real jokes are the ones not listing Lara tbh. Maybe I should run the poll next time and use my discretion to just not consider lists that did not have Lara.

 

[capt_Luffy]

People have the right to vote however they want. Being the admin you need not influence others as you are basically projecting your stuff on others.

I think he already mentioned if even any single one of them states that they really consider Jadeja the best batsman ever, he will accept all their votes.

 

[Socerer 01]

I think he already mentioned if even any single one of them states that they really consider Jadeja the best batsman ever, he will accept all their votes.

@PlayerComparisons has the opportunity to do the funniest thing ever

 

[Red_Ink_Squid]

Again applying the "No Woakes" rule:

1 Bradman
2 Sachin
3 Hobbs