PlayerComparisons
International Vice-Captain
Two ATG quicks
So longevity all of a sudden taking back seat here. Clearly you have bias towards indian playersBumrah
I realise this is is a spin off of the Warne / Steyn discussion. Longevity matters when you’re dealing with bowlers of comparable quality.
On quality, Bumrah is well ahead of Broad.
I mean, he has a bias towards Indian players, but comeon; I think Bumrah has proven himself enough by now to be ahead of Broad.So longevity all of a sudden taking back seat here. Clearly you have bias towards indian players
I have already voted bumrah on this but Im pointing out his reasoning flaws on different threads to vote indian player no matter what oppositionI mean, he has a bias towards Indian players, but comeon; I think Bumrah has proven himself enough by now to be ahead of Broad.
Understandable, but Marshall also have less than 50℅ wickets of Murali.I have voted for Broad .
My reason: Bumrah doesn’t even have 50% wickets of Broad. Who knows he loses form and average goes southward
Marshall played in an era where highest wicket taker had 400 wkts .Understandable, but Marshall also have less than 50℅ wickets of Murali.
Then what about Steyn and Anderson??Marshall played in an era where highest wicket taker had 400 wkts .
Steyn atleast has 400 wktsThen what about Steyn and Anderson??
Why do you say it ?I usually agree with the longevity stuff but then I watch Bumrah and he is just so good. Not like he has only played a handful of tests either.
Ridiculous comment. The difference between Steyn and Warne is indistinguishable on quality and longevity factors.So longevity all of a sudden taking back seat here. Clearly you have bias towards indian players
You are being biased here . Admit itRidiculous comment. The difference between Steyn and Warne is indistinguishable on quality and longevity factors.
The difference between Broad and Bumrah is massive on quality - seven points of average,