GoodAreasShane
Cricketer Of The Year
Okaaaaaaaaaaaaay thenWard > Ward.
Okaaaaaaaaaaaaay thenWard > Ward.
Haha fixed.Okaaaaaaaaaaaaay then
Yeah I knew what you were trying to say, just found that one amusingHaha fixed.
Probably too old. Though if the Australian middle order keeps misfiring.....Webster is having a very, very good season.
Would he be in the radar for "Test Cricket".?
In the New Zealand touring squad.Anyone know why Boland not playing in the latest round?
Yeah I twigged moments after postingIn the New Zealand touring squad.
I suppose the main question might be is he a better option than Mitch Marsh? You'd feel Webster's only opportunity to play is to bat 6 and bowl a few useful overs. Great, versatile fielder tooWebster is having a very, very good season.
Would he be in the radar for "Test Cricket".?
360 runs @52 in 21/22 and 596 @43 in a bowler friendly 2022/23 season. This season is a step up, but he's been very good for a while.They're basically the same age. I know he's had a great season but I just can't be enthused about swapping one big-hitting medium pace all-rounder for another. What we need are proper middle and top order batsmen, not more all-rounders. We've got a stack of those.
It's not even that I'm opposed to it, it's just that I don't care. It's possibly the least important selection decision we have to make in the next 12 months.360 runs @52 in 21/22 and 596 @43 in a bowler friendly 2022/23 season. This season is a step up, but he's been very good for a while.
FYI, not saying he's the future or anything, but I've got no issue with picking him at peak for a few years while the younger guys come through.
What if he turns out to be the next best batting option regardless. You're not going to ignore him just because he bowlsThey're basically the same age. I know he's had a great season but I just can't be enthused about swapping one big-hitting medium pace all-rounder for another. What we need are proper middle and top order batsmen, not more all-rounders. We've got a stack of those.
Oh in that case my "you don't get considered unless you bat five at the lowest" rule of thumb comes into playWhat if he turns out to be the next best batting option regardless. You're not going to ignore him just because he bowls
Very high testosterone levels too.McAndrew is just a really impressive cricketer isn't he? Runs in hard all day, good consistent pace and a more than useful bat
Epitome of consistency