shortpitched713
International Captain
I think we need more Hammond comparison threads.
I still think Hammond's early short peak is among the finest in all of cricket history..... This man held the highest Test run scorer record for a whopping 33 years (and is a tally in which he never even let Bradman to surpass him); and by all accounts, he was exceptional on sticky dogs.Was looking for this comp and was flabbergasted by the vote tally.
Is this still the opinion of the community? Think Chappell has proven himself a bit more, and WSC just pushes him ahead.
Its funny, you’d think his peak would be earlier in his career and include his 28-29 series, but his actual peak was in the late 30’s. Guess he was just spooked a bit by Bradman at firstI still think Hammond's early short peak is among the finest in all of cricket history..... This man held the highest Test run scorer record for a whopping 33 years (and is a tally in which he never even let Bradman to surpass him); and by all accounts, he was exceptional on sticky dogs.
Hammond is not overrated at all, piss off.Two extremely overrated bats.
You do realise he’s not on the forum anymore and this thread is over a year old?Hammond is not overrated at all, piss off.
He, infact, did not realise that...You do realise he’s not on the forum anymore and this thread is over a year old?
polls just work that wayHammond is the better overall player and one of two guys I think of as the "perfect cricketer"
But the gap in batting isn't this wide. Wally, Sunny, Greg and for me, Punter are are ridiculously close to each other. Don't get the disparity in the vote.
Yeah, I agree with you on the difference between the two - I personally rank Hammond as one of the top 10 batsmen in history and Chappell as one of the top 15, and I daresay a lot of us are similar there.Hammond is the better overall player and one of two guys I think of as the "perfect cricketer"
But the gap in batting isn't this wide. Wally, Sunny, Greg and for me, Punter are are ridiculously close to each other. Don't get the disparity in the vote.
I do understand, they just tend to be closer.Yeah, I agree with you on the difference between the two - I personally rank Hammond as one of the top 10 batsmen in history and Chappell as one of the top 15, and I daresay a lot of us are similar there.
But as Johan said that's the nature of polls - if 50 people all think Hammond is slightly better than Chappell then that's a 50-0 paddlin', despite everyone agreeing that the gap between them is small.
Faced better bowlers.@DrWolverine how tf is Chappell better than Hammond?
it's a silly era argument isn't it?Faced better bowlers.
And I am going to say something but you won’t like it
Hammond played with plumbers imo.it's a silly era argument isn't it?
no point in making a tired joke, you can only hope Wolverine and Subs would understand why every credible poster laughs at these era arguments to discredit everything behind an arbitrary date.Hammond played with plumbers imo.
Rich coming from you.no point in making a tired joke.
even I have a limitRich coming from you.