Aidan11
International Vice-Captain
It can be summed up in one word - Winning!There needs to be an essay on what bazball is.
It can be summed up in one word - Winning!There needs to be an essay on what bazball is.
Unfortunately no on can be told what Bazball is.There needs to be an essay on what bazball is.
I see, it's an experience and surpasses the linguistic limitations of any human language.Unfortunately no on can be told what Bazball is.
You have to see it for yourself.
No and just no some morepick your no 11 based on their batting
@Adorable Asshole @Prince EWS would approve and Garner would be proud
Nah Bazball will save humanity once it’s saved test match cricket and cured cancer.Bazball is aggressive #intent played with the knowledge that this is a silly game and we are all going to die of a coronavirus or nuclear war within 15 years so who gives a ****
And even when you see it, never write an essay about it…Unfortunately no on can be told what Bazball is.
You have to see it for yourself.
It's all about lifting inhibitions off otherwise limited cricketers (whatever "otherwise" and "limited" mean in this context, we might need to redefine those terms soon) and letting them know it's OK to take elite-level cricket back to the under-16 playground where/when the differences in skill weren't as great. It's fascinating, really; there's a fair bit of smoke and mirrors going on with the whole thing but more than a little substance as well. It's the most interesting development strategy/approach-wise in my time of watching cricket.I see, it's an experience and surpasses the linguistic limitations of any human language.
Gill since he moved to 3 has been hideous
It wasn’t overly spin friendly. I mean yeah there was more for spinners than seamers, but it never did unplayable stuff. 230 should’ve been achievable but it was more the pressure that did for them.This another case of India losing another Test on an unnecessarily overly spin-friendly surface when they would have been better off just with a regular wicket offering a bit more for the quicks?
India's seamers are if anything better than England's don't think they need these "90% of overs bowled by spin" type scenarios to beat England
Pope was dropped, but only when on three figures (I think). Played and missed a bit early on (in his own words - I was still in bed at that point) but what I saw he was playing freely. A really bloody good innings. Stokes said it trumped Root’s efforts in Asia!That's a pretty impressive win for England. One of the hardest assignments in world cricket to go to India and win, particularly with England's lack of quality spinners.
Only seen the scorecard and not any of the game, but did Pope and Hartley play well, or have a fair old slice of luck in their performances?
Pope’s innings was one of the best I’ve seen by an English batsman in my 40+ years of watching. I didn’t know he had it in him.That's a pretty impressive win for England. One of the hardest assignments in world cricket to go to India and win, particularly with England's lack of quality spinners.
Only seen the scorecard and not any of the game, but did Pope and Hartley play well, or have a fair old slice of luck in their performances?
#RentfreeYet both away sides won. You know your stuff. Not
Maybe not so much spin-friendly, as pace-unfriendly? Slow, low, little movement etc? When England are bowling 90% of their overs from spin there's got to be something causing that surelyIt wasn’t overly spin friendly. I mean yeah there was more for spinners than seamers, but it never did unplayable stuff.