• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* England in India 2023/24 #CryMoreTour

Arachnodouche

International Captain
Yeah but the jury's still out on this Indian batting lineup IMO. Rohit's mind seems elsewhere at times, Jaiswal looks an incredible talent but he's been around five minutes. Gill's Test record is abysmal, and Kohli is still in the latter stages of his career. Iyer will be fine at home, granted, his problems are away from home.
Maybe this is just bias against batsmen but a horses for courses policy for batsmen feels more degrading for the batsman concerned than it does for bowlers. Bowlers are mostly given leeway to thrive or toil based on conditions; so should batsmen, ideally, but there seems more criticism leveled at someone who's batting out of his element. I suppose we expect the latter to find a way through batting technique alone which ultimately is fully self-contained as opposed to bowlers who always have the middle-mode of the wicket to enhance or detract from their effectiveness regardless of bowling technique.
 

Molehill

Cricketer Of The Year
Aye, it's especially weird since we had success in Pakistan not long ago playing a three man pace attack of Anderson/Robinson/Wood on unhelpful surfaces, with Leach backed up by Root plus random allrounders like Jacks for spin duties. The seamers keeping things tight and chipping away at wickets were key there. Seems odd to now bench Test calibre seam bowlers for County reserve level spinners.

At this rate, we might not even win the series...
That's the key bit. Even on this pitch, you suspect that the Test level seamers would be somewhat more problematic to Indian batsmen that Rehan and Hartley. The run rate would certainly be massively different. It's even more concerning that Root has outbowled them too.

I somewhat doubt this match will see Day 4, India to be bowling for a little spell before Lunch and then clean everything up sometime after Tea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FBU

JavaHurricane

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
That's the key bit. Even on this pitch, you suspect that the Test level seamers would be somewhat more problematic to Indian batsmen that Rehan and Hartley. The run rate would certainly be massively different. It's even more concerning that Root has outbowled them too.

I somewhat doubt this match will see Day 4, India to be bowling for a little spell before Lunch and then clean everything up sometime after Tea.
So far this Test has gone a lot along the lines of the Nagpur game last year. I won't be surprised if, as in that game, India bat for an hour more tomorrow and then wrap up an innings win by Tea. With the variable bounce worsening and at least one use of the surface-breaking heavy roller all but certain in the morning tomorrow, England's batters may all be caught like cats on hot tin roofs. Possibly Root aside, they might try slogging their way out of trouble and lose their stumps to the spin trio.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah, this one's all a bit boring now, which was always likely. Ideally India will declare first thing to put the game out of its misery, but they probably won't. It's hard to disagree with the comments on this page about the selection of Hartley and, to some extent, Rehan. At least one genuinely test class seamer instead of the former must have asked more questions of the Indian batters. Beyond that, it's just the latest evidence of the consequences of our domestic system forcing nearly all of the CC games to be played in Spring and Autumn instead of the Summer. Not that we'd have been likely to beat India in India anyway, but we might at least have some serious options in the spin department. And it's probably worth remembering this tour when the usual idiots moan about Somerset or whoever producing a pitch that takes some turn before tea on Day 4.
 

andruid

Cricketer Of The Year
Theres not much we can do about our batting, but if they had selected
say Anderson Yobbo Leach Dawson with Root as support, they still have
3 spinners and a proper new ball attack. Goin into a test with 2 rookie
spinners with so little FC experience is sheer foolhardiness. Innings
defeat looming.
Bring back Monty Panesar :ph34r:
 

Ashes81

State Vice-Captain
I really feel that the BGT series last year demonstrated that this India team are not invincible. That was not by any means a vintage Australian side that turned up but they ran this Indian team mighty close. But you have to respect the conditions, plan and strategise sensibly and bowl with a ton of control.

However that was on different pitches to what this seems to be.
This Indian team is a really tough proposition at home because of their spin options.

Their batting can be vulnerable, it's nowhere the quality of the great Tendulkar, Dravid, Sehwag, Ganguly era.

But the current side has good depth to their batting - Jadeja, Ashwin and Axar just give them so many options.

The Aussies showed they can be troubled but in the end India do what they do at home.

On turning pitches they'll nearly always ouyplay the opposition. At 2-1 they then produced a road ensuring the draw that they need.

This England team's weakness is our spinners. Leach is decent but hasn't played for months. Ahmed is very promising but I genuinely don't know why we've picked Hartley.

Unless one of the pitches is a road, I don't see us drawing a test, nevermind winning one.
 

Shady Slim

International Coach
a pinnacle of Shady Slim Thought is not just picking spinners for the sake of it when you tour the subcontinent and thinking bowling on subcontinent wickets are spin go brrrrrrrr; nine times out of eight a really good pace bowler will do better than your average mediocre spinner unless it’s the sort of pitch where dean elgar could rip a five for like that nagpur one

and yet many WANGS touring teams all fall for this trap again and again
 

Shri

Mr. Glass
a pinnacle of Shady Slim Thought is not just picking spinners for the sake of it when you tour the subcontinent and thinking bowling on subcontinent wickets are spin go brrrrrrrr; nine times out of eight a really good pace bowler will do better than your average mediocre spinner unless it’s the sort of pitch where dean elgar could rip a five for like that nagpur one

and yet many WANGS touring teams all fall for this trap again and again
1706315509296.jpeg
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Tom’s actually right, he was just terrible at doing it. It’s why sc results are rightly regarded as less important. Any able bodied human can bowl finger spin, and rewarding that sort of mediocrity is second rate
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Tom’s actually right, he was just terrible at doing it. It’s why sc results are rightly regarded as less important. Any able bodied human can bowl finger spin, and rewarding that sort of mediocrity is second rate
Ashwin, Jadeja and Axar are incredibly difficult to play in India but there’s a reason why they’re not automatic selections in many other countries
 

Top