That is exactly why they are lucky because it's not raining despite being forecasted.But, it's not raining.
That is exactly why they are lucky because it's not raining despite being forecasted.But, it's not raining.
It's not that surprising that SA have made the semi finals given their form against Australia in their lead up ODI series.So the top 4 are decided and are almost as expected with the exception of SA. Most people predicted Ind, England, Australia, NZ.
The bowling attack that England picked never gave me confidence that they were going anywhere in this tournament. They relied so heavily on their batting that they were okay conceding few extra runs or scoring so many runs that would compensate of their bowling leaking extra runs.It's not that surprising that SA have made the semi finals given their form against Australia in their lead up ODI series.
It's surprising that England have been so bad though and were out of semi finals contention so quickly.
... So India 'unluckily' would've finished with 17 points then?Actually NZ are lucky, I guarantee you if India were in the same position this game would've been washed out without a ball bowled.
This is shockingly stupidActually NZ are lucky, I guarantee you if India were in the same position this game would've been washed out without a ball bowled.
Yea this SL team is a joke! Zim or WI would've given better fight than this lost SL team.Theekshana really is like the Sri Lankan Woakes, he bats better and more sensibly than most of his team's top order.
Obviously you don't follow India's game.This is shockingly stupid
He's never made a 50 in professional cricket (Woakes has done that 34 times, and has 10 FC hundreds). He looks better than that and has improved recently but he's not Woakes.Theekshana really is like the Sri Lankan Woakes, he bats better and more sensibly than most of his team's top order.
End this conversation here . Not the right thread to discuss our ‘luck’Obviously you don't follow India's game.
Brother there's only 10 teams...which includes Netherlands, Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka..You wouldn't need to be a rocket scientist to get atleast 80 percent of top 4 right .So the top 4 are decided and are almost as expected with the exception of SA. Most people predicted Ind, England, Australia, NZ.
We just got sawn off by rain in the last game. The forecast of rain is the unlucky part to begin with.Obviously you don't follow India's game.
And I mean Bangers SL Afg Neth were never super likelyBrother there's only 10 teams...which includes Netherlands, Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka..You wouldn't need to be a rocket scientist to get atleast 80 percent of top 4 right . Whatever 4 you pick would be 40% of the total teams without even using logic.
Bairstow, Root and Buttler all being out of form has cost them more than their bowling, even a better bowling attack can't make up for the lack of runs.The bowling attack that England picked never gave me confidence that they were going anywhere in this tournament. They relied so heavily on their batting that they were okay conceding few extra runs or scoring so many runs that would compensate of their bowling leaking extra runs.
The moment their batting started failing they were exposed
... Either way if the World Cup consisted of the 4 teams West Indies still wouldn't have qualified for the semi's... lolBrother there's only 10 teams...which includes Netherlands, Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka..You wouldn't need to be a rocket scientist to get atleast 80 percent of top 4 right .