Can we add a former CT winner in there as well?Has to be said though, this is a really bad way of deciding who gets to be in the CT lol , why not just have a triangular series between 8th , 9th and 10th ..Winner goes to the CT ..That's a series people would watch
Presumably as the NRR for Sri Lanka and Bangladesh is pretty similar, it will be either move up three or only one. How many do the Netherlands have to get for England to only be 9th?NRR update - If Netherlands score less than 270, England will move up 3 places in the table.
Definitely , more the merrierCan we add a former CT winner in there as well?
Asking for my West Indies team.
Yeah, fairly similar. They'd need 280 to prevent England moving up to 8th.Presumably as the NRR for Sri Lanka and Bangladesh is pretty similar, it will be either move up three or only one. How many do the Netherlands have to get for England to only be 9th?
ThanksYeah, fairly similar. They'd need 280 to prevent England moving up to 8th.
And obviously the less the better as it buys them more space for the Pakistan game (when they'll know what's required anyway).Thanks
140/5 at 20 overs to go so +120 would make 260 not much more than a run a ball. England need wickets.
@Teja. ?Enough time for a Teja double hundred?
EXCEPT POSSIBLY IN EUROVISION ONE DAY!WE ARE EUROPEAN CHAMPIONS
SOMETHING AUSTRALIA WILL NEVER SING