• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Michael Clarke vs Hashim Amla

Who is the better test batsman?


  • Total voters
    23

shortpitched713

International Captain
What's the argument for this result ( gun beard aside )?

I don't have much of an opinion on this one, but didn't think it would be so one sided for Amla. Clarke to me seemed a very high quality bat, same as Amla, and he also won a bit more and had a higher strike rate as well, for whatever those two factors are worth.
 

BazBall21

International Captain
What's the argument for this result ( gun beard aside )?

I don't have much of an opinion on this one, but didn't think it would be so one sided for Amla. Clarke to me seemed a very high quality bat, same as Amla, and he also won a bit more and had a higher strike rate as well, for whatever those two factors are worth.
Amla batted higher and has a better away record. Clarke averages more because he had much easier home conditions and retired just as batting began to get more difficult.
 

shortpitched713

International Captain
Eh, I'd still characterize the vast majority of Amla's career as being in an easier batting era. Still, factors above could go some ways in explaining the difference in average. Just don't think it's big enough to swing it definitively towards Amla though.
 

BazBall21

International Captain
Eh, I'd still characterize the vast majority of Amla's career as being in an easier batting era. Still, factors above could go some ways in explaining the difference in average. Just don't think it's big enough to swing it definitively towards Amla though.
Yeah but South Africa was a definitively tougher place to bat than Australia during the batting era. And Amla has the better away record. Then factor in the batting positions and it's not much of a debate. I don't think Amla is much better exactly but I think he's clearly better.
 

Top