Not insignificant is not significant enough hereRoot does a not insignificant level of bowling too
Literally his last three Tests and four ODIs without bowling and apparently that means you can no longer rank him as an all rounder.Yeah and to be fair to say Stokes hardly bowls is disingenuous. He hardly bowls now but for nearly a decade he was a genuine all-rounder.
Kallis is obviously a much better player but Stokes was more of a real all-rounder than Kallis pre-knee injury.Lol. Here even Kallis is not considered an all-rounder by many. Stokes is free real estate imo.
Shaun Tait v Anthony McGrath?I think this is a really close one. Therefore I'm surprised Stokes is doing so well. If only people thought the same way on Tate v McGrath, sigh
I think second. Stokes > Freddie for me.It's very close but while Ben Stokes is possible only the third best England all-rounder of the past 50 years, Root is the best batter so wins it on that.
Shaun Tait v Anthony McGrath?
I couldn't tell if Ali meant he was behind Botham and Freddie or Botham and Greig.I think second. Stokes > Freddie for me.
Forgot about Grieg. I would put him 3rd between Stokes and Fred.I couldn't tell if Ali meant he was behind Botham and Freddie or Botham and Greig.