karan_fromthestands
State Captain
Yes, "will", "could've", "should've", etc. Just plain BS IMO.Keyword being will
Yes, "will", "could've", "should've", etc. Just plain BS IMO.Keyword being will
Yeah because he has already achieved what Hogg achieved in his entire career. Now as Kuldeep has a lot of games left, he will past go him to become the greatest chinaman.Keyword being will
Jimmy Anderson the best fast bowler of all time tooYeah because he has already achieved what Hogg achieved in his entire career. Now as Kuldeep has a lot of games left, he will past go him to become the greatest chinaman.
Brad Hogg has won two world cups and a champions trophy (Basically 3 World Cups since all the teams who can realistically win a WC compete in it) , Kuldeep Yadav has won nothing yet. Brad Hogg took 34 WC wickets at 19 , Kuldeep has 11 wickets in WC @ 41 ..He's still a rookie in comparison to Brad HoggYeah because he has already achieved what Hogg achieved in his entire career. Now as Kuldeep has a lot of games left, he will past go him to become the greatest chinaman.
Why do you bring WC win while comparing player. WC is won by a team and it has nothing to do with a player calliber.Brad Hogg has won two world cups and a champions trophy (Basically 3 World Cups since all the teams who can realistically win a WC compete in it) , Kuldeep Yadav has won nothing yet. Brad Hogg took 34 WC wickets at 19 , Kuldeep has 11 wickets in WC @ 41 ..He's still a rookie in comparison to Brad Hogg
No because apart from Longetivity he doesn't have anything in his favour. But for kuldeep their stats are more or less same and then kuldeep has so many years left. So basically he has longetivity plus everything Hogg has. So Kuldeep> HoggJimmy Anderson the best fast bowler of all time too
He bought it up cause Hogg has a great wc record and played a part in AUS winning two world cups while kuldeep has a poor wc record and hasn't won anything? This could change if India win this WC, but given their similiar records, using WC performance as a measuring stick to stack them up seems fair.Why do you bring WC win while comparing player. WC is won by a team and it has nothing to do with a player calliber.
SO according to u SREESANTH> CURTLY AMBROSE OR DALE STEYN OR RICHARD HADLEE
And to counter your second point Kuldeep was at his lowest in 2019 and 2020 and he has worked on himself and now he is a completely different bolwer. Just wait and watch his wc records this year.
SO brian lara is the worst player. Doesn't have a wc and didn't performed great in wc.He bought it up cause Hogg has a great wc record and played a part in AUS winning two world cups while kuldeep has a poor wc record and hasn't won anything? This could change if India win this WC, but given their similiar records, using WC performance as a measuring stick to stack them up seems fair.
Flawless reasoningNo because apart from Longetivity he doesn't have anything in his favour. But for kuldeep their stats are more or less same and then kuldeep has so many years left. So basically he has longetivity plus everything Hogg has. So Kuldeep> Hogg
WC Wins comes by a team not alone. Even Munaf patel has a wc and has got wickets that doesn't mean he is better than marshall who was quite ordinary in wc. A player should be judged by his performance not by his team. If that was the case then all players from england are garbage becasue they haven't won till 2019He bought it up cause Hogg has a great wc record and played a part in AUS winning two world cups while kuldeep has a poor wc record and hasn't won anything? This could change if India win this WC, but given their similiar records, using WC performance as a measuring stick to stack them up seems fair.
I don't see the issueWC Wins comes by a team not alone. Even Munaf patel has a wc and has got wickets that doesn't mean he is better than marshall who was quite ordinary in wc. A player should be judged by his performance not by his team. If that was the case then all players from england are garbage becasue they haven't won till 2019
then tell me your reasoning.Flawless reasoning
Hogg > Kuldeep because he could do more with his tonguethen tell me your reasoning.
Did I say or imply that? Just saying performance on the highest stage seems a good way to compare players with otherwise similiar records. Don't think that's a controversial take, is it?SO brian lara is the worst player. Doesn't have a wc and didn't performed great in wc.
I don't want to talk to fools like u. Proving your baseless views with baseless points.Hogg > Kuldeep because he could do more with his tongue
Don't ask me how I know
It can be a good take to compare players on their wc performance but not the team wc performance. But a player can not only be judged on one parameter. And you are trying to prove your point on the basis of just Hogg WC performance. And Kuldeep can play another wc who knows his record can be better than that of Hogg.Did I say or imply that? Just saying performance on the highest stage seems a good way to compare players with otherwise similiar records. Don't think that's a controversial take, is it?
I don't think he was "figured out". He didn't introduce any mystery balls that needed figuring out. He just lost control and confidence IMO.Kuldeeps transformation has been interesting. Very rarely see a bowler like him get figured out, then add 5-10 km's and come back better than ever.
You sound just like my parentsI don't want to talk to fools like u.