None of this has anything to do with luck and to suggest so reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of what makes national sporting teams successful. Hint: it's to do with governance, investment, and priorities. Cricket Australia is by no means a perfect or praiseworthy organisation but it is orders of magnitude better than the radioactive disaster zone that is Rugby Australia.I get that, but Australians are generally quite lucky with the success of their National Teams. It's not like you've ever had England Cricket in the 90's. Even when cricket was rubbish in the 80's, Aus still managed to win a World Cup. It's interesting that as success has waned in rugby, the Aussie interest has fallen off a cliff. What happens if the cricket team turns to ****?
In England, apart from the 6 Nations, everything is on PPV too. And I'm not talking about Sky either.Yeah it’s on 9 but you only get Australia games. Foxtel use to have all the European tours and comps, South American tours, super rugby etc and they lost that this year to Stan which is even a bigger blow. Channel 9s coverage of the World Cup currently is terrible
Yeah I mean we do have some good coverage of sports here that’s free for a lot of sports. We don’t have many channels either. Rugby just dying here from coverage to people that can play the game.In England, apart from the 6 Nations, everything is on PPV too. And I'm not talking about Sky either.
I never mentioned luck. But instead of supporting a sport which is going through its struggles, Aussies have deserted it. Wanting your own team to lose is just weird.None of this has anything to do with luck and to suggest so reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of what makes national sporting teams successful. Hint: it's to do with governance, investment, and priorities. Cricket Australia is by no means a perfect or praiseworthy organisation but it is orders of magnitude better than the radioactive disaster zone that is Rugby Australia.