Ashwin has yet to peak.Virat apart from his peak form in 2016-2019 is pretty mediocre in tests. Ashwin peak is over but still he is great in sc and wi. Is okay in Eng and Aus. Just struggles in SA. Virat struggles in swinging condition of Eng and Nz and is okayish in Wi.
One of the "primary" contributors, kindly get it right. Kohli wasn't a match winner in Australia. Very Kallis like.Wow a contributor, how impressive.
I would take Kohlis four tons in 2014 please.
Averaged 47-48 for preceding 4 years. Not mediocre. Plus it's a very dicey way to pick out a player's best years and analyse his performances. Ashwin is thoroughly mediocre in Eng and Australia, poor in SA. Virat for all his struggles in Eng, managed to have a fantastic series there against his primary nemesis.Virat apart from his peak form in 2016-2019 is pretty mediocre in tests. Ashwin peak is over but still he is great in sc and wi. Is okay in Eng and Aus. Just struggles in SA. Virat struggles in swinging condition of Eng and Nz and is okayish in Wi.
If its true then no doubt he will go past warne.Ashwin has yet to peak.
4 hundreds is a lot tho. Was facing the same Johnson who'd destroyed Eng a year back. Also Lyon in decent form. Was pretty decent in his other tours as well. his hundred at Perth is the best knock by an Indian in AustraliaOne of the "primary" contributors, kindly get it right. Kohli wasn't a match winner in Australia. Very Kallis like.
I think you'd have managed a hundred on that your if you'd tried.
Yes he was. It is nonsensical that it's been forgotten. However my crusade will ensure his performance is remembered. Tied Smith in knots for two tests, saved the third game with the bat. Only morons will deny he wasn't one of the main reasons we won that series.main contributors is stretching it
His career will be over before then.If its true then no doubt he will go past warne.
Ignorant opinion.Ashwin is thoroughly mediocre in Eng
Even if you say that, you're surely not suggesting that Ashwin is a better player in Aus than Kohli?Yes he was. It is nonsensical that it's been forgotten. However my crusade will ensure his performance is remembered. Tied Smith in knots for two tests, saved the third game with the bat. Only morons will deny he wasn't one of the main reasons we won that series.
Haters gonna hate. Brain will continue braining.
Nah he averaged 44 till 2015 and is averaging less than 40 after his peak. Not at all good for a number 4 sc batsman. Yeah he had a fantastic series in SA, AUS and Eng. But ashwin also had won us numerous games in India and we can't neglect his success here.Averaged 47-48 for preceding 4 years. Not mediocre. Plus it's a very dicey way to pick out a player's best years and analyse his performances. Ashwin is thoroughly mediocre in Eng and Australia, poor in SA. Virat for all his struggles in Eng, managed to have a fantastic series there against his primary nemesis.
By ATG standards.Ignorant opinion.
Was that my original claim?Even if you say that, you're surely not suggesting that Ashwin is a better player in Aus than Kohli?
He is not a Pakistani spinner. He can play till 2026.His career will be over before then.
Averages 28 there. Should I clap?Ignorant opinion.
Was that my original claim?By ATG standards.
Kohli's peak began in the 2013/4 series in SA and scored everywhere after that except England in 2014.Nah he averaged 44 till 2015 and is averaging less than 40 after his peak. Not at all good for a number 4 sc batsman. Yeah he had a fantastic series in SA, AUS and Eng. But ashwin also had won us numerous games in India and we can't neglect his success here.
28 for a spinner in England is thoroughly mediocre apparently? lmao.Averages 28 there. Should I clap?
Yes and still wouldn't have peaked.He is not a Pakistani spinner. He can play till 2026.
Ok. Let me rephrase. Kohli has an ATG record in Aus and SA, and ATG performances in Eng. Plus a great record at home. Ashwin just has an ATG record in SC and WI.Was that my original claim?
Good to see the shifting goalposts. Sad!