SillyCowCorner1
Moooo
Please refer to the Drama threadHosts should have played the opening game. Weird scheduling indeed, to say the least.
Please refer to the Drama threadHosts should have played the opening game. Weird scheduling indeed, to say the least.
Facebook will go down that dayShould have been a Bangladesh game up front to kick it off with an ind.
Actually India too scared to host us for the opening gameShould have been a Bangladesh game up front to kick it off with an ind.
It’s a fairly common opinion. Not sure I’d go as far as ‘ordinary’ but it’s not the best attack in the competition or anything.Am I the only person who thinks while England's batting line up remains strong and deep that their bowling is nothing more than ordinary?
I mean you can say that, but the last 3 games in England saw them give NZ 3 pretty resounding beatings......and that was without Wood. The bookies have England 4-9 to win this.Am I the only person who thinks while England's batting line up remains strong and deep that their bowling is nothing more than ordinary?
NZ to win this first game, and England to struggle against the likes of India, Pakistan, Australia & South Africa thereafter.
Say you have COVID (Cricket Oz Vs India Disease)I'm fuming that they are starting the WC on my 'Anchor Day' i.e. I am in the office.
Can't wait for Oz V India Sunday though. Am currently working through my excuses to get out of birthday meal for Mother in Law accordingly
Would be awkward for England if Stokes and Bairstow are both ruled out. They only have one spare batsman in the squad (Brook). Would mean playing something likeThat's Bairstow, Stokes, Williamson, Southee with niggles for this game. And the world cup has not even started.