Michael Clarke vs Inzamam-ul-Haq

[PlayerComparisons]

.

 

[Adorable Asshole]

Not a fan of either of those but Inzamam for longevity.

 

[The Sean]

Unquestionably the two best players with a highest Test score of 329.

 

[Coronis]

Inzy was better vs Australia than Clarke was vs Pakistan so easy choice duh.

 

[SillyCowCorner1]

Depends on whom I like running out their respective batting partners.

 

[number11]

Both very good bats. Inzi was a better allround player for me.

 

[h_hurricane]

Both very good bats. Inzi was a better allround player for me.

No one here would disagree that Inzi was the more rounded player.

 

[subshakerz]

Clarke. Better against pace.

 

[trundler]

Clarke. Better against pace.

Clarke wasn't that flash against pace outside of 2012.

 

[subshakerz]

Clarke wasn't that flash against pace outside of 2012.

True but Inzi was more of a disappointment.

 

[BazBall21]

This is very close but I go Michael because he has relatively smaller problems. Away average of 40 on the surface is disappointing but he does have solid returns everywhere except Ban/UAE with tiny sample size tax while Inzi had obvious deficiencies against extra bounce in terms of technique and results. Inzi has his noteworthy upsides, but so does Clarke. Eleven big hundreds and a thunderous record against South Africa.

 

[ankitj]

True but Inzi was more of a disappointment.

So you don't believe when Imran said Inzamam was the best player of pace since Viv Richards

 

[Silver Silva]

Clarke is like an Australian version of Kohli

 

[Aidan11]

Chip and potato.

 

[SillyCowCorner1]

Clarke is like an Australian version of Kohli

He's a few heads below Kohli on the totem pole though.
Adam Voges was the Australian version of Kohli.