• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Fifth Test (The Oval, London) 27-31 July

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Yeah I really don't see why we lose the review? Legitimacy of catches are never DRS reviews?
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
What a dramatic session. The Woakes spell blew the game open, but then a very handy partnership between these two.

146 runs needed, 7 wickets in hand is absurdly well placed for a match. Second (third?) new ball will decide the game I think.
 

KungFu_Kallis

International 12th Man
I’m in ****ing Split. Had proper reception. In Dubrovnik yesterday. Today it’s trash.

I bunged on a stomach bug to get out of a shore trip so I could get back here and ****ing watch this ****ing **** and the ****ing ****s have **** ****ing internet. It’s ****ing **** and I hate the ****ing place and I hate Croatia* and they can all get ****ed

*actually a very nice joint.
is that you Ben? You suddenly sound upset for some reason...
 

Molehill

Cricketer Of The Year
They're not debating the catch, they're debating the review. Australia didn't have to review the Starc catch because he claimed it first. Should Stokes do the same?
 

Top