Yes! Straya need parity at the very least ideally a lead of around 50Aus played Negetiv cricket since 1st ball today, they are in danger situation right now. Even eng gets 50 run lead they have full control of the test as Aus have to bats Last
Yeah I guess Wade could be a goer. Tough to say he'd definitely do better than Carey but given how badly he went in India earlier this year it likely would be much of a muchness.I don't think Aus have a better keeping option for an Asia World Cup though. Can't see Inglis being any better and it's a bit of an ask to throw a debutant like Peirson straight into a World Cup. I guess going for a Dravid-esque pick like Handscomb could be an option but I'd much prefer a specialist keeper
edit: Forgot about Wade if he's still around and willing, and playing ok, he could be an option?
Don’t think you need a specialist keeper as much in short form your not getting much nicks behind the stumps a lot the wickets anyway apart from the new ball. You want someone who can bat like Jos Butler, pant type playersI don't think Aus have a better keeping option for an Asia World Cup though. Can't see Inglis being any better and it's a bit of an ask to throw a debutant like Peirson straight into a World Cup. I guess going for a Dravid-esque pick like Handscomb could be an option but I'd much prefer a specialist keeper
edit: Forgot about Wade if he's still around and willing, and playing ok, he could be an option?
I don't think so, last I remember was the games in Cairns/Townsville against Zim & NZ. Those games Carey was playing and batting up the order too, like number 4 IIRCHasn't Inglis been first choice for the last year or so? All those JAMODIs wash over me like raindrops in a thunderstorm tbf so I could be wrong
Oh I have zero memory of those at all so yeah, like I saidI don't think so, last I remember was the games in Cairns/Townsville against Zim & NZ. Those games Carey was playing and batting up the order too, like number 4 IIRC
I don't think Aus have a part-time keeper who's that good a bat anyway. Handscomb could potentially do a middle-order subcontinent speciliast sort of role though which he did well on a couple of ODI tours when Smith/Warner were bannedDon’t think you need a specialist keeper as much in short form your not getting much nicks behind the stumps a lot the wickets anyway apart from the new ball. You want someone who can bat like Jos Butler, pant type players
Neither teams approach has been right for me.I agree with this. I am not a massive fan of Bazzball I don’t think it’s Test Cricket made for all conditions , BUT Straya have gone totally the other way here and the scoreboard was going nowhere.
I think in India you would though.Don’t think you need a specialist keeper as much in short form your not getting much nicks behind the stumps a lot the wickets anyway apart from the new ball. You want someone who can bat like Jos Butler, pant type players
Both him and khawaja was moaning all morning for nothing. Didn’t see England batters doing it yesterdayAh so that's what Marnus was moaning about. The Broad bail switch shenanigans.
Yeah the tempo Smith has batted at is the sweet spot. Nothing extravagant, just rotating the strike constantly and waiting for the (admittedly exceedingly rare) bad ball.Neither teams approach has been right for me.
We've been too over attacking with the bat and the Aussies have been too defensive.
You need to play positively but not wrecklessly. The class batsmen on either side - Smith and Root, usually play at the right tempo.
I’d take Englands approach this series still. Least you know if they bat two sessions they’ll have 250. Did not see the point of aus first session today it was like they was playing for a draw on day 5Neither teams approach has been right for me.
We've been too over attacking with the bat and the Aussies have been too defensive.
You need to play positively but not wrecklessly. The class batsmen on either side - Smith and Root, usually play at the right tempo.
I've no issue with Labuschagne batting defensively in tough conditions against accurate bowling but striking at 10 is another matter entirelyI don't think it's a logical assumption at all to say that Aus would be better off if they hadn't gone super slow that first session. There's every chance they could have been rolled for 150 if they hadn't.
However it clearly hasn't been a great success and it was not great to watch at all. Who knows could still pay off if it puts the miles in England's quicks' legs and has them knackered for the 4th innings. In that case 200 off 85 overs is more valuable than 200 off 55 overs.
Unironically batting better tbhStarc playing the exact ball Carey got out to with a lot more intelligence