subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
Has this been done before? And if not, how would we approach this?
Nice idea. Get each member to nominate their best 5 commentators at the start. Then start knock-out rounds with that list seeding as per the rating and number of nominations they got.Has this been done before? And if not, how would we approach this?
Maybe to make it easier, we just go from number 1, everyone give their nominations, and then we do a counting and proceed until we get a top ten?Nice idea. Get each member to nominate their best 5 commentators at the start. Then start knock-out rounds with that list seeding as per the rating and number of nominations they got.
Yeah he is the Bradman here.Its just like best batsman though, Benaud wins by a landslide.
Yes, that's easier. That can be done too.Maybe to make it easier, we just go from number 1, everyone give their nominations, and then we do a counting and proceed until we get a top ten?
He was only 6 foot, not that impressive.I will go with Richie Benaud, for his stature and taking cricket commentary to new heights.
Arlott is Bradman, while Benaud is SobersIts just like best batsman though, Benaud wins by a landslide.
Would it make sense to make this a Battle of the Living Commentators then? Then it 1. Would be more interesting and 2. Wouldn’t hamper the old-timey commentators that those under 35 never heard live.Its just like best batsman though, Benaud wins by a landslide.
Hmm that does make sense and doesn't prejudice against younger posters.Would it make sense to make this a Battle of the Living Commentators then? Then it 1. Would be more interesting and 2. Wouldn’t hamper the old-timey commentators that those under 35 never heard live.