-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
*Official* Second Test (Lord's, London) 28 June–2 July
- Thread starter Magrat Garlick
- Start date
hazsa19
International Regular
No because everyone on the field other than Carey thought the ball was dead.
subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
Lol that has nothing to do with Stokes.
honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
Yeah, that is usually an attempt to take a run and therefore, far more likely to be a real run-out, no?
Socerer 01
International Captain
good let it die
morgieb
Request Your Custom Title Now!
TBF this is a stumping, not a run out.
The_CricketUmpire
U19 Captain
As a former umpire, I am more than happy to explain the situation.
The initial parts of the Dead Ball law (Law 20) explain it:
20.1 BALL IS DEAD
20.1.1 The ball becomes dead when;
20.1.1.1 it is finally settled in the hands of the wicket-keeper or of the bowler.
20.1.2 The ball shall be considered to be dead when it is clear to the bowler’s end umpire that the fielding side and both batters at the wicket have ceased to regard it as in play.
20.2 BALL FINALLY SETTLED
Whether the ball is finally settled or not is a matter for the umpire alone to decide.
The ball wasn't finally settled in the hands of the wicket-keeper (Alex Carey), therefore the ball was still "Live" & in play. Good thinking by Alex Carey and also I've seen a few comments on Twitter that what Carey did was against the spirit of game. I'm telling you now, it certainly was not against the spirit of the game.
The initial parts of the Dead Ball law (Law 20) explain it:
20.1 BALL IS DEAD
20.1.1 The ball becomes dead when;
20.1.1.1 it is finally settled in the hands of the wicket-keeper or of the bowler.
20.1.2 The ball shall be considered to be dead when it is clear to the bowler’s end umpire that the fielding side and both batters at the wicket have ceased to regard it as in play.
20.2 BALL FINALLY SETTLED
Whether the ball is finally settled or not is a matter for the umpire alone to decide.
The ball wasn't finally settled in the hands of the wicket-keeper (Alex Carey), therefore the ball was still "Live" & in play. Good thinking by Alex Carey and also I've seen a few comments on Twitter that what Carey did was against the spirit of game. I'm telling you now, it certainly was not against the spirit of the game.
Michelle Fivefer
U19 Cricketer
[
But the other reply gives more context.
GIMH
Norwood's on Fire
This is a very stupid post. Disappointed in you
Socerer 01
International Captain
they’ll need a new job anyway once they are all rightfully sacked for losing the series
subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
Stokes honestly seemed reckless in that Green over. Wild swinging and a good bit of luck. If he is going to try to slog every ball, England definitely won't win.
The_CricketUmpire
U19 Captain
And whilst I am at it - Umpire Erasmus has had a good game and those two tricky decisions...he has nailed 100%....as per the Laws of Cricket.
Michelle Fivefer
U19 Cricketer
Judging by behaviour in the Long Room at lunch, “fun” is possibly not the word.
chris.hinton
International Captain
Correct.
ashley bach
Cricketer Of The Year
Some very well educated posters have more than once pointed out Stokes shouldn't even be playing.
Will be interesting catching up on their reasons, even more so if he was to miraculously get England across the line.
Will be interesting catching up on their reasons, even more so if he was to miraculously get England across the line.