Yeah he's not picked the inswinger thereThat was a tight leave with the slope.
Agreed but is “England fit for humans “ is borderlineBairstow being reminiscent of a turd behind the stumps was an astute observation tbf.
Moving the ball on the Lord's slope is not usually considered the most difficult skill. He's otherwise bowled rubbish. i suppose if you want to be smug you can.nom nom
Good ball?Yeah he's not picked the inswinger there
If something is universally true at every level then proving otherwise would require extraordinary evidence. Anyone who's ever picked up a cricket ball knows your insistence is hilariously untenable.Maybe you should look in a mirror when the entirety of your argument in this case consists of a simple assertions without evidence based on something that you want to believe (to an almost religious extent).
Captains don't get banned anymore for slow over rates since WTC. The team loses WTC points instead (Aus and Eng both lost 2 WTC points in last test)Play until 642pm uk time today, to get the overs in
no chance of that with this attack. Be lucky to get above 80 overs in
another fine incoming and I cant remember if Stokes is on points for a ban?
Go awayGood ball?
Yeah, but he said it about England, so it's fine.Agreed but is “England fit for humans “ is borderline
just imagine if I had said the same about other countries
there would have been howls about that one
You have 73 on the board and we have dropped two catches,what's their to moan about from Aussie point of viewWhat on earth
Thank you. If they were, his ban would be imminentCaptains don't get banned anymore for slow over rates since WTC. The team loses WTC points instead (Aus and Eng both out 2 WTC points in last test)
You’d have had questions to answerAgreed but is “England fit for humans “ is borderline
just imagine if I had said the same about other countries
there would have been howls about that one
I see. I’ll not stoop to that levelYeah, but he said it about England, so it's fine.
This really is an expression on the level of a religious belief. You're the one making the claim, you go prove it. And remember, the umpires did not find any change in the condition of the ball.If something is universally true at every level then proving otherwise would require extraordinary evidence. Anyone who's ever picked up a cricket ball knows your insistence is hilariously untenable.
Exactly . I’ve fired back but I’m told to shut the f upYou’d have had questions to answer
Your cleary biased. It is a waste of time trying to correct you. And you keep making the same points over and over. I’ll just ignore you in future.I am. But it appears I’m not allowed to fire back
I mean “it’s mostly English posters trash talking”
that’s hilarious really
We're all hoping yours is though mateThank you. If they were, his ban would be imminent