tbf as much as i'm an advocate for BIG NES, you pick your best bowlers and tail batting is a nice bonus. if you have to have your tail bail u out vs a team which is packing zak crawley then you don't deserve to win anywayNeser could provide that tail batting we're desperately missing too.
England batIt'll be Anderson and Broad for sure IMO.
Bring back SiddleCummins/Lyon/Boland/Hazlewood is a worryingly long tail.
why not bothAlternatively, I could just ban aussie tragic.
Good to have you here, Ricky.No, bowl. The batsmen will be too nervous.
As I said. Time for a 150-run session. In 18 overs.Time for England to use #Bazball energy to win the toss
There was an okay article on that issue. Blames T20 and (implicitly) the fact the coaches spend so much time giving practice to Smith and Marnus.Cummins/Lyon/Boland/Hazlewood is a worryingly long tail.
Considering Hazlewood's fragility and Starc's terribleness, there's an argument for picking him as a bowler anyway.tbf as much as i'm an advocate for BIG NES, you pick your best bowlers and tail batting is a nice bonus. if you have to have your tail bail u out vs a team which is packing zak crawley then you don't deserve to win anyway
With australia commencing it’s innings straight after the lunch breakAs I said. Time for a 150-run session. In 18 overs.
If I ban one and the other one logs in, can I ban it for evading the ban?why not both
Why so negative mate?160-1 at Lunch