SillyCowCorner1
Moooo
The underrated GOAT, in Sadagoppan Ramesh, disagrees.Risabh Pant has had a better Test career I think
The underrated GOAT, in Sadagoppan Ramesh, disagrees.Risabh Pant has had a better Test career I think
Probably GilchristProbably Hayden for Aus.
Not even among the top left handed bats from Sri Lanka as trundler rightly concluded. I'm just glad that more people are now aware of what a fraud he is - nothing but a glorified HTB with a couple of decent away knocks. Decent keeper in limited overs though.
Same era, but I give Hayden a bit more cred for openingProbably Gilchrist
yeah but Gilchrist also had to keep wickets.Same era, but I give Hayden a bit more cred for opening
So I heard once and no idea if this is true or not. There is a school of thought that it's preferable for right handers to bat left handed and vice versa (I suppose making the stronger hand on the top of the bat?) Anyway, it's something that Australian coaches have been more proactive in with juniors than other countries.Australia has crazy depth in lefthanded bats:
The late Peter Roebuck used to espouse this theory when he was on ABC radio in between fiddling with kids.So I heard once and no idea if this is true or not. There is a school of thought that it's preferable for right handers to bat left handed and vice versa (I suppose making the stronger hand on the top of the bat?) Anyway, it's something that Australian coaches have been more proactive in with juniors than other countries.
Would explain the out of whack left dominance of Aussies and I'm tipping a large chunk of them are actually right handed?
There is such an idea, though the supporting studies for it are, shall we say, tendentious. But it's not going to account for anyone from before the last few decades.So I heard once and no idea if this is true or not. There is a school of thought that it's preferable for right handers to bat left handed and vice versa (I suppose making the stronger hand on the top of the bat?) Anyway, it's something that Australian coaches have been more proactive in with juniors than other countries.
Would explain the out of whack left dominance of Aussies and I'm tipping a large chunk of them are actually right handed?
Grain of salt, cos I was utterly rubbish, but I tried switching to left as a kid. Offside shots (anything from cut to cover drive) felt a lot more natural batting left, and leg shots were better right. Straight felt better on the ground left and in the air right.So I heard once and no idea if this is true or not. There is a school of thought that it's preferable for right handers to bat left handed and vice versa (I suppose making the stronger hand on the top of the bat?) Anyway, it's something that Australian coaches have been more proactive in with juniors than other countries.
Would explain the out of whack left dominance of Aussies and I'm tipping a large chunk of them are actually right handed?
You aren't exactly comparing him to Sachin. He played 7 years. The others were 11 and 12. There would be a fair case for putting him on top if he had retired after 7. As is, I think I'm more tempted to dock the other guys for longevity than him.Yeah let's go with that explanation for why I forgot Sanga. I had Dimuth down as 2nd best, then realised Jayasuriya was better and ultimately put Jayasuriya down as #1, forgetting Sanga altogether. Leyland Vs Gower is close surely though I'd be betraying my own principle there if I didn't reward Gower for being the better top order player of the two. Longevity question marks over G Pollock potentially.
Totally different sport, but it kind of worked out ok for Nadal.The late Peter Roebuck used to espouse this theory when he was on ABC radio in between fiddling with kids.
Mike Hussey switched from right to left handed but only because he grew up understandably loving Australia's greatest left handed batsman TOTAB.
The tricky thing with assessing South African cricketers whose careers were affected by isolation is how much stock to place in their first-class careers as we all know that you can never absolutely certain that someone will be able transfer those performances into the test arena. However, I would say that Pollock's test career was just about long enough to be able to say that he was able to do so and therefore his first-class stats can form part of the discussion.You aren't exactly comparing him to Sachin. He played 7 years. The others were 11 and 12. There would be a fair case for putting him on top if he had retired after 7. As is, I think I'm more tempted to dock the other guys for longevity than him.
Ya, agreed. I don't think you can be confident either way when comparing him to elite bats, but when it comes to comparing him to someone like kirsten, there is plenty to go off.The tricky thing with assessing South African cricketers whose careers were affected by isolation is how much stock to place in their first-class careers as we all know that you can never absolutely certain that someone will be able transfer those performances into the test arena. However, I would say that Pollock's test career was just about long enough to be able to say that he was able to do so and therefore his first-class stats can form part of the discussion.