Boland's set-up was good tbf. The ball in isolation was meh, the catch was theatrical.. and yeah the shot was particularly crap. The shot had much more to do with the wicket than anything else IMO.
71 players took 75 catches ( non keeper)
It was the cricketing equivalent of someone asking you to pull your finger.
What
Buttering team
This is an issue, and always has been, with commentary everywhere, from every country. There are individual exceptions that are non-biased but in my experience Aus, NZ and Indian commentators are probably the worst at it. Everything is seen through the lens of your team, so if they have a success or something good happens it's because your team did a good thing, not that the other team did a bad thing. And vice versa if something bad happens it must be because your team did something wrong, not because the opposition did good.
The opposite happened here though. Gavaskar credited Boland and Smith instead of shitting on Kohli for his crap shot.
One DK is a terrible commentator, while the other DK was a worse bowler than Matthew Hoggard.
No shame tbf, Hoggard was one of the best 85 bowlers of all time.
It’s the producers catering to the viewers
