welp, he's doomed to playing 150 odis for an average of 32 and strike rate of 78.Chapman is alright
Yesss it's back.Pak have won toss & have to bowls vs nz in 1st ODI
Yeah 100%. Practically everyone seems to be playing out of position as per the scorecard. Ravindra unfortunately is being looked at as a batting allrounder version of Santner which is just wrong.I know he's not a popular inclusion to begin with but I don't see how Henry Nicholls is being set up to succeed by putting him at #6.
Same with Ravindra at #7.
Bowes
Ravindra
Young
Nicholls
Latham (wk)
Chapman (finisher for Auckland often)
Mitchell
Seems a more sensible top 7.
Yeah that would explain the silly order they're in if they're essentially being given deliberate experience in those roles.I wonder if that 3, 4, 5 of Mitchell, Latham, Chapman is possibly what we'll get at the World Cup, with Allen and Conway opening ...
Mike Hesson said he was in favour of Guptill making a comeback. Wouldn't be the worst move, if Boult is in the frame then that shouldn't prevent Guptill from being consideration either. Otherwise Nicholls and Young are playing for one spot in the top 3 you feel.I wonder if that 3, 4, 5 of Mitchell, Latham, Chapman is possibly what we'll get at the World Cup, with Allen and Conway opening ...
Yes, yes it really would.Mike Hesson said he was in favour of Guptill making a comeback. Wouldn't be the worst move
It's about prep for the World Cup in India, where Phillips + Santner will be at #6 and #7 (or possibly Phillips Macewell Santner 6 7 8 and only 2 quicks + Sodhi). I suspect either Young-Mitchell-Latham or Mitchell-Latham-Chapman at 3-4-5, unless Young has a string of failures and Nicholls has a couple of match winning innings.Nicholls and Rachin at 6 and 7 in this lineup with a bunch of actual 5s and 6s ahead of them from 3 to 5 is so dumb.