Whilst true they won 2-1, they made 165 and 149, 415-9, 158 then 130-1. Three significant failures, no one averaged over 45. I still maintain their approach is yet to work consistently against quality bowling opposition.
What about the flat wickets in Pakistan? England won 3-0 there whilst Australia could only win 1. Jimmy still managed to take wickets at 18!!
I hope Jimmy rips Australia apart, I really do...although then it'll just be the boring old 'but can he do it on a sunny day in Sydney?' stuff that apparently keeps him out of the ATG clubhouse. Mind you, it's not often sunny in Sydney as we've seen in so many NY Tests in recent years.
Did you see the attack Pakistan put out against England?
They won't "negate" him but he will be less effective in the sense Aus loves batting (and bowling) on them.
He will average 6 and you will go into your hole, just like you’re yet to walk down Martin Place in the buff (which tbf society is thankful for)
Tbf he will only get one or two goes
... per game
The interesting thing is that England took 60 wickets on those surfaces, Australia took 41. So which attack is most suited to flat pitches?
Right, because movement due to the ball hitting the ground is impacted more by the air above than the ground below. Next you'll say pitches can't be prepared to suit types of bowling.
Kind of ignores the batting approaches involved and the teams playing.
Yes the renowned weak attacks of New Zealand, India and South Africa.
