It’s weird isn’t it. Our sides in the 21st century have mainly been better than those from the 90s but back then we always used to at least win a token test.You probably need to limit it to series in England for this to be taken seriously tbh. The Ashes here since 86/87 have all been pretty one-sided.
Still you never know. Maybe in 2025 someone will be able to do a TikTok about an England test win in Australia.
Unlikely, but you just never know.
Yeah it is an odd thing. Steve Waugh tried to get Aus to focus a lot more on dead rubbers but never quite got them to sweep a series. I think in 06/07 Aus was always going to win comfortably but a sweep was nigh unheard of then, but they just had the shits after being cheated out of 05 so showed zero mercy.It’s weird isn’t it. Our sides in the 21st century have mainly been better than those from the 90s but back then we always used to at least win a token test.
Would you really call it rivalry in 80s ?Aus-WI from 75/76 til about 2000 or so was pretty fierce. Played each other a lot
If Ashes is not an option because it is mostly one sided, then why is Australia v India there. Apart from the last 2 series in Australia, it has pretty much been India smash us there and we smash them here. It is only competitive on a series count front, and for that the Ashes is just as competitive for the whole 50 years, barring the memorable domination by Australia from 89-05Which 2 Teams according to you have/had fiercest Test rivalry ?
IND- Pak not in option because most of the matches used to end in Draw
Ashes not in option because it is mostly one-sided
Aus-Wi not in option because rivalry is of mainly 10 years (90s) otherwise they are mostly one sided.
It was still a fierce rivalry though. We took everything they had - in the face, in the chest, etc and on the scoreboard, but we still kept on inviting them back what seemed every year. We always pulled out a win even though we were hopelessly outclassed. The rivalry from the 70's carried it through the 80's so that it meant something more in the 90'sYeah WI dominated most of the 80s for sure, fair call that. 81/82 was a good series - they had to win in Adelaide to draw it after Aus won in Melbourne off the back of that famous Kim Hughes ton. Rest of the 80s was mostly one way traffic though
Really ? Let’s count.If Ashes is not an option because it is mostly one sided, then why is Australia v India there. Apart from the last 2 series in Australia, it has pretty much been India smash us there and we smash them here. It is only competitive on a series count front, and for that the Ashes is just as competitive for the whole 50 years, barring the memorable domination by Australia from 89-05
Yeah - some of them I don't count. Some of those, the series tally belies reality. It's the opposite of the Ashes 3-0 in 2013. That was much closer than the number. Anyways, India v Australia is definitely a good option, but leaving the ashes out is just...Really ? Let’s count.
1998 competetive
2001 competetive
2003 competitive
2004 competetive
2007 competetive
2010 competetive
2017 competetive
2018 competetive
2020 competetive
2023 competetive
Name me another rivalry having 10 competitive series
sunil1z is not my multi ftrHow come the title says 50 years but all the listed options are from 1993 onwards?
Thats what they all say.sunil1z is not my multi ftr
Well, take it up with Bill Gates then.Despite the Windows being trash for some time
I feel like NZ vs England since Matt Prior denied us a series win has always given us some good contests.New Zealand Vs. Bangladesh surely.
I was kind of tongue in cheek about NZ and Bangers, but NZ & England being competitive in the last 20-25 years is very true, even the series last year or the 3-0 scorelines in 2008 and 2004 were all very close matches, where NZ was on top for large periods... I'd need have a good look through the scorecards but I intuitively feel they've generally been even tests/series, unlike when we've played the likes of SA & Aust by comparison.I feel like NZ vs England since Matt Prior denied us a series win has always given us some good contests.
I know Sri Lanka tours here every year it seems but we always seem to have crackers when we tour there, and the most recent 1 run win and some other great performances in recent tours have made them a more interesting prospect then one might assume in NZ conditions.
I'd certainly agree with that, but you could also look at it the other way. Why can Australia be so dominant at home yet cannot win an Ashes series away? Yes, England have underperformed, but a number of Aussies seem to have significantly better averages at home (Warner, Head being obvious examples). They are not frail in home conditions.I also don’t think the past three home Aus sides have been especially vintage outfits. Bowling has been good but plenty of batting frailty. England has massively under performed here for the players they’ve had since 10/11