• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Glenn McGrath vs Shaun Pollock

Who was the better test cricketer?


  • Total voters
    35

PlayerComparisons

International Vice-Captain
Came up in the other thread and thought it would be interesting. McGrath obviously the better bowler but who’s the better cricketer
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
McGrath.

Pollock was a no.7/8 bat and his average flatters him.

The difference between their bowling means potentially several series victories over the course of a career.

The difference between their batting means several matches at most.
 

CricAddict

Cricketer Of The Year
The value that each of them bring to a team depends on the make-up of the team. It is similar to Ashwin vs Jadeja situation. If we can only take one of Mcgrath/Pollock, in a team with weak tail, Pollock gets in at 8 while Mcgrath will always get in for any team with a decent 7/8.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
The value that each of them bring to a team depends on the make-up of the team. It is similar to Ashwin vs Jadeja situation. If we can only take one of Mcgrath/Pollock, in a team with weak tail, Pollock gets in at 8 while Mcgrath will always get in for any team with a decent 7/8.
What if you don't have a decent 7/8 but the rest of your bowling is crap too?
 

Top