This is ridiculous. Someone failing to add to their achievements doesn't mean they retrospectively were worse.If you asked me in 2019, I would have said Kohli. Now it’s clearly ABD.
ABD averages 47 in SA compared to 50 overall. Kohli also has done very well in SA.ABD did bat for some time as a keeper and for some time as opener for which should be taken into consideration. he also batted mainly in SA which wasn’t flat compared to the 2000 roads
take that opening matches out and he averages 52, its over a significant sample size tooABD averages 47 in SA compared to 50 overall. Kohli also has done very well in SA.
ThisIf you asked me in 2019, I would have said Kohli. Now it’s clearly ABD.
???A late career tear might help Kohli catch up with AB in tests, although he might need his home ground staff to be kinder with the wickets they produce.
For all their brilliance in the limited overs formats, both have severely underachievers in terms of titles.
Is it ridiculous? I certainly don't see how @Sunil1z is rating Kohli as 'retrospectively worse'. His overall career has simply moved behind de Villiers' because of his failure to add to his achievement.This is ridiculous. Someone failing to add to their achievements doesn't mean they retrospectively were worse.
Nobody was saying Kohli was confirmed ATG, but most were saying he was on the road to being one.the mistake was people rating Kohli based on the position he would have been in future with how good he was doing at that time. things don’t always work out in a linear fashion but this is a mistake most if not all of us make
You also tend not to expect players who have been as good as he was to fall off a cliff. His last four years have been way worse than late career Ponting for instance.Nobody was saying Kohli was confirmed ATG, but most were saying he was on the road to being one.