Says Mr Overrates.Also yeah, people who hate cricket might sometimes reference the whole ‘haha you play for 5 days’ thing, but mostly they just find the game fundamentally boring. Like, the 40 second wait from one ball to the next is what bothers them, not the format. That makes no sense, but then of course it doesn’t because people who don’t like cricket are stupid. Trying to formulate a version of cricket to appeal to people like this is really a waste of time tbh.
And produce pitches that can aid games that can go to the 5th day. We are guilty of not producing pitches that make for good viewing just to get results our way. It worked in the past but it has come at a cost.Look at the media reaction, nobody cares this much when we win a close ODI or T20. Add into that the first three days of the test were sold out, the fourth day looked packed too and I’m pretty sure it was close to capacity yesterday (even if they did throw the doors open).
Get it back on a platform where people can watch it and listen to it (happening next year with TVNZ and hopefully SENZ), show it the respect it deserves in 3 match series and first class preparation and development, and test cricket will thrive in this country.
Treat it like an unloved embarrassment and that’s what it will become.
I don’t care about 10 second discrepancies from ball to ball I just want the promised quantity of cricket each daySays Mr Overrates.
You make some fair points.As much as we talk up test cricket which is my favorite format it can't compete with the t20s and no one should even try to make it as such. Test cricket followers are niche and that'll stay that way. T20s fund test cricket in a way. This was one of the greatest ever test match no doubt but look at the other test matches we have played since last year. Draws vs Pakistan were not bad viewing, one game was quite close. We got smashed by South Africa at home, we smashed South Africa as well. Bangaldesh won quite comfortably and we smashed them as well. We had a thrilling draw against India and then got walloped in the next test.
Australia wiped the floor against all sides but for the recent tests vs India.
England beat us fairly hands down in England and did so to India as well...
One test match will not turn things around in my opinion, those that just keyed in for the last day or last moments of this test match will disappear as soon as the next series starts unless there is a change in brand of cricket we play. I can't think that's going to happen in the near future. You're not expecting Conway, Latham, Kane to go bazball like. Maybe the future players that are brought up on playing t20s may but that'll take time.
Maybe England, India and Australia can still continue to shore up good support for test cricket but don't think we can based on this one test match.
Tbh, different strokes for different folks. I'm just glad we're in a time where all these entertainment options are available in cricket. All formats are fun. Especially when something is on the line against a in-form opponent.I think NZC greatly underestimates the average NZ sports fan tbh. Even among those moving away from the traditional "rugby and cricket" (and All Blacks games are always sell outs so there's no shortage of traditional fans) there's a sense that T20 is the entertainment format rather than a real sport. "Cricket is boring" types still don't actually like them either because they're still standing around a lot.
I know they're chasing the family night out and it works because T20 pulls in big money, but those people don't actually care. They're not there to support New Zealand fanatically, they're there to have a few drinks and cheer at sixes.
It isn't just shallow, it's a missed opportunity. The most introverted and Shortland Street obsessed middle aged woman will discover inner bloodlust at the All Blacks or even a Chappell-Hadlee ODI. The 7th T20 against a randomised team? Lol, no one ****ing cares.
If NZC wants to settle for playing WWE with a wooden stick then that's pretty sad. Everyone can see T20 is a less complex sport than other cricket formats or rivals for attention like other NZ sports, American sport, football and stuff like skateboarding.
Even against a less followed test side (no Barmy Army) like SL you watch, people will show up on the weekend at Hagley. T20 has its place as a fun night out but going all in on it is a trap imo but hey what would I know, I'm not a CEO I just talk to other sports fans.
I think you mean Stokes and Foakes.Tbh, different strokes for different folks.
I wouldn't call Young's selection was dodgy. He is the next cab of the rank. It didn't help in the end but it could have. It's all timing really.You’d like to think the selectors can at least make the simple observation that the players who contributed well to varying extents were basically everyone bar Young, Nicholls and Bracewell, and that Wagner’s overall performance was mediocre. Literally just takes a glance at the scoreboard to confirm this, and I don’t think anyone is crying out for anyone other than these guys to be dropped. On paper it was actually perfect because the dodgiest selections were the worst players.
I don’t want Young dropped either, I’m just saying that if the selectors wanted justification for any of their marginal calls, they won’t find it in this test. Of course, if Young is seen as expendable then maybe the selectors will use this test as a reason to drop him, which is a shame.I wouldn't call Young's selection was dodgy. He is the next cab of the rank. It didn't help in the end but it could have. It's all timing really.
Yup I think so too... He will get a standard call from Gary or Larsen asking to go back to domestic cricket and put some numbers which he will but by then someone else will take his place as it has happened before.I don’t want Young dropped either, I’m just saying that if the selectors wanted justification for any of their marginal calls, they won’t find it in this test. Of course, if Young is seen as expendable then maybe the selectors will use this test as a reason to drop him, which is a shame.
The Stokes that Woakes for Foakes may not work f'uh all blokes.I think you mean Stokes and Foakes.
Told you lot Wagner will play at least couple more years before he will think of retirement and obviously no changes coming any time soon.I feel sorry for Young and Sodhi, but I'd be very tempted to pick both Ravindra and Phillips and get them to share the minimal spin duties (a regular spinner like Sodhi would still get smashed by the Sri Lankans, Bracewell would be destroyed, and Ajaz is 34) and that way we can play 4 seamers to at least blood a new one (Smith or Shipley??) at 8 since Wagner won't (be told to) retire now.