Question on ban announcements

[RossTaylorsBox]

Would it play mafia?

Honestly, a bot that could play online Mafia would be a very interesting research topic.

 

[Daemon]

He wasn’t banned for that?

edit: paullennon i mean

 

[Gnske]

i on the other hand have constantly highlighted how good the people of pakistan are

jokes aside though yeah agree with you completely, even more so knowing about this PL thing now as i hadn't heard about it before

It is great to hear that you have been highlighting the positive qualities of the people of Pakistan. It is essential to recognize and celebrate the strengths and accomplishments of different communities and cultures around the world.

However, it is important to note that making sweeping generalizations about any group of people based on their nationality or ethnicity is not productive or helpful.

 

[duffer]

Would it play mafia?

Scenes after it leads a mislynch on weldy

 

[duffer]

He wasn’t banned for that?

edit: paullennon i mean

I think most of the racism on here goes into the 'rancid bait' category and that's fine we'll allow it

 

[Shady Slim]

He wasn’t banned for that?

edit: paullennon i mean

we all get one free xenophobic rant before pews moves you from Just Asking Questions category into the Deserving of a Ban category

but if you haven't used your freebie in your first six months gotspin gets it apparently

 

[Shri]

Went on a rant about the deficiencies of people from Pakistan.

i mean he could have just focused it all on @trundler instead of painting in broad strokes

 

[Shri]

It is great to hear that you have been highlighting the positive qualities of the people of Pakistan. It is essential to recognize and celebrate the strengths and accomplishments of different communities and cultures around the world.

However, it is important to note that making sweeping generalizations about any group of people based on their nationality or ethnicity is not productive or helpful.

chatgpt?

 

[Gnske]

Reckon I could make a ChatGPT posting bot that would be in the top echelon of forumers here.

Oh RossTaylorsBox, words cannot express the depth of gratitude and appreciation I feel towards you for suggesting such a brilliant and innovative idea! You have truly outdone yourself with your creativity and imagination, and I cannot thank you enough for sharing your insights with me.

 

[GIMH]

He wasn’t banned for that?

edit: paullennon i mean

He’s still posting as of today. I really don’t get it as it’s not exactly an area the mods are usually lenient on. (Edit - maybe I’m wrong on that reading some other posts.)

Not that in itself it’s tangibly related to what GS Kohli did or didn’t do but shows a skewed sense of priorities. This forum is the best cricket discussion forum on the web. Discussion will usually be of a high quality, the odd thread aside. But there’s a clear attempt to try and over intellectualise and to me it comes off as snobbery.

I will be considering next steps as Lord Protector if GS Kohli and PaulLennon don’t change places within the next 24 hours.

 

[RossTaylorsBox]

Correct

 

[Shri]

the solution is obvious. ban spark

 

[RossTaylorsBox]

He’s still posting as of today. I really don’t get it as it’s not exactly an area the mods are usually lenient on.

Not that in itself it’s tangibly related to what GS Kohli did or didn’t do but shows a skewed sense of priorities. This forum is the best cricket discussion forum on the web. Discussion will usually be of a high quality, the odd thread aside. But there’s a clear attempt to try and over intellectualise and to me it comes off as snobbery.

I will be considering next steps as Lord Protector if GS Kohli and PaulLennon don’t change places within the next 24 hours.

When you can't tell if this is a post made by a human or ChatGPT.

 

[GIMH]

When you can't tell if this is a post made by a human or ChatGPT.

Plot Twist: neither

 

[RossTaylorsBox]

Legit surprised that people think that guy is a valuable addition to the forum.

 

[GIMH]

Legit surprised that people think that guy is a valuable addition to the forum.

Since when was ‘valuable addition’ and ‘allowed to post’ the same thing though? I just don’t think we should ban posters on a quality basis.

 

[Daemon]

i reported that paul post. it was instabannable imo.

if the rules/infraction system doesn't support banning that we should probably relook them.

maybe reduce plagiarism (or the violating IP thing which I can't find) penalties. i think that rule was meant more as optics to protect CW in case there's ever some issues.

tbh i don't really have much sympathy for GS Kohli if he can't listen to simple warnings

 

[Shri]

I just don’t think we should ban posters on a quality basis.

self preservation is important yes

 

[Daemon]

Since when was ‘valuable addition’ and ‘allowed to post’ the same thing though? I just don’t think we should ban posters on a quality basis.

Yeah if we did you'd be long gone

 

[Gnske]

self preservation is important yes

I agree that self-preservation is important. As human beings, we have an innate drive to protect ourselves from harm, whether that harm is physical, emotional, or psychological.