OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
NoYou mean to say that Smith’s knock was better than Gibbs ?
NoYou mean to say that Smith’s knock was better than Gibbs ?
Thanks
Wow what a great innings surprised to see Sehwag hit a Century.Since people are nominating random knocks now , I am nominating this great Sehwag knock vs NZ in a jamodi
And also it was in the second inningsGood choice, when you factor in that T20 brand of cricket was unknown at that time.
One of the best innings 78* by Bevan at SCG.Bevans 74 against the Windies I guess.
Gibbs wasn't as great as Smith played a key role in the same innings.You mean to say that Smith’s knock was better than Gibbs ?
without Gibbs they never could have dreamt of going too far. Smith's innings was very important but Gibbs is the Superman.Gibbs wasn't as great as Smith played a key role in the same innings.
What about Kohli’s 133. Flat track yes(and I’m not saying its as good as Viv‘a 189) but came in a tri series tournament, where Ind had to chase an impossible target(considering the overs) to stay alive, and as a young rookie he did bash the world’s pre-eminent LOI bowler at his peak(at the time), that too in the death overs. Also no one played half as big a role as him in that(Gambhir and Raina had important innings, but of far less importance, I.e not as big as G Smith maybe in that 434 chase)I mean, everybody has their criteria, but to me the game importance can be one too. Strength of opposition to me tho is far more important. Zimbabwe games should be seriously considered for greatest knocks ever.
Aside from Viv, the contenders for best ever innings are Lloyd 75 and DeSilva 96 being final knocks.
It always seems to get called a must-win game for India, but in fact as long as they'd still won their next match against Australia they were still guaranteed a semi-final spot (assuming WI didn't suddenly get thrashed by Zimbabwe .Kapil 175 for me. Such big scores were a rarity in ODIs but for me the bigger thing is the context. For India had they lost that match vs Zim, it was curtains.
I rate that innings highly tooWhat about Kohli’s 133. Flat track yes(and I’m not saying its as good as Viv‘a 189) but came in a tri series tournament, where Ind had to chase an impossible target(considering the overs) to stay alive, and as a young rookie he did bash the world’s pre-eminent LOI bowler at his peak(at the time), that too in the death overs. Also no one played half as big a role as him in that(Gambhir and Raina had important innings, but of far less importance, I.e not as big as G Smith maybe in that 434 chase)
Yeah but the whole momentum of the innings was Smith who batted faster than Gibbs.without Gibbs they never could have dreamt of going too far. Smith's innings was very important but Gibbs is the Superman.
Except it was in a JAMODI.Viv's innings had a decent attack, came in at an impossibly bad situation, scored mostly with the tail at more than a run a ball in slow scoring era, scored a huge score with a major percentage of overall total, and was the only one with a notable score in the match. Plus some awesome shots that are still replayed today. Ticks so many boxes that there is no point comparing with another.
It depends on how much importance you place on context and quality of attack vs percentage of total score and doing all that with the tail. I'm with Days of Grace on this one. Viv's innings was astonishing, but it was only part of a 3 match series that was just an hors d'ouevres before the main business of the test series. Lloyd's innings meant that his side won the WC Final. And Australia's attack was way superior to the England guys that Viv faced at that stage of their careers.I am also a bit confused regarding which innings was better Clive Lloyd 102 vs Vivs 189*